70/ 100
C
OverallF54/100
nixit Menstrual Disc, Wash, Wipes, Lube, Tote

Nixit · Menstrual Cups

nixit Menstrual Disc, Wash, Wipes, Lube, Tote

C · Moderate

Lower PFAS concern, core materials are silicone and cotton, but no public PFAS disclosure from brand.

Verdict: BuyMedical-grade silicone disc with minimal known chemical hazards; cotton/water-based accessories pose low risk if used as directed.

Nixit's menstrual disc is primarily medical-grade silicone, a non-fluorinated elastomer not typically associated with intentional PFAS. Wipes and wash appear to use conventional cotton/cellulose and water-based formulations.

Shop Nixit on Amazon →

Material

Medical-grade silicone (menstrual disc); cotton/polyester blend (wipes); water-based formulations (wash, lube)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

period care is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The menstrual disc is medical-grade silicone, a non-porous elastomer that does not leach estrogenic compounds like BPA and resists degradation during normal use and cleaning. The wipes are a cotton/polyester blend, and the wash and lubricant are water-based formulations, all materials with established safety records in intimate-contact applications. Silicone does not off-gas volatile organic compounds (VOCs) at body temperature, and cotton/water systems carry negligible risk of chemical migration into sensitive tissue.

The brand's record and disclosure

Nixit does not publicly disclose material test reports, safety certifications, or third-party audit results on their website or marketing materials. The brand has not issued statements addressing PFAS, phthalates, or heavy metal contamination, which is typical for smaller menstrual-product manufacturers but limits independent verification. No recalls or safety complaints have been documented in FDA or consumer databases for this product line. The brand's silence on chemical testing is not unusual in this category but represents a missed opportunity for transparency.

How it compares in its category

Medical-grade silicone menstrual discs are generally considered lower-risk than latex or rubber alternatives, which can contain residual proteins and allergens. Compared to traditional menstrual cups (also silicone), discs have a larger surface area and different insertion mechanics, but identical material safety profiles. Wipes and lubricants bundled with premium menstrual products often lack third-party certification (fragrance-free, hypoallergenic labeling); Nixit's water-based formulations align with industry practice rather than exceeding it.

If you buy it

Wash the disc and reusable components with mild soap and water before first use and after each cycle; avoid bleach or boiling, which can degrade silicone over time. Store in a breathable bag (included tote) to prevent moisture accumulation and mold; inspect the disc quarterly for tears, permanent discoloration, or brittleness as signs of material breakdown. If irritation develops, discontinue use and patch-test the wash and lube on non-sensitive skin to isolate the cause. Replace the disc every 2-3 years or if structural integrity is compromised.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Silicone degradation and leachables

Medical-grade silicone is chemically stable, but prolonged exposure to heat (boiling, dishwasher), UV light, or aggressive solvents can cause surface cracking and microparticle shedding. No specific leachate toxicology studies for Nixit disc are publicly available; risk is low under normal use but increases with improper care.

Possible

Fragrance allergens (wipes, wash, lube)

Product labeling does not confirm fragrance-free formulation for wash or lube; undisclosed fragrance components (natural or synthetic) can trigger contact dermatitis or vulvovaginal irritation in sensitive users. Nixit provides no ingredient list for these accessory products on their public-facing materials.

Possible

Microplastics from polyester wipes

The cotton/polyester blend wipes may shed microfibers during use and washing; while ingestion risk is low in this application, microfiber shedding into aquatic systems is a documented concern for all synthetic textiles. Long-term dermal accumulation from repeated wipe use is not quantified.

Possible

Bacterial or mold colonization

Silicone is non-porous but can harbor biofilm in folds or seams if not dried thoroughly between uses; the included tote, if used damp, may promote mold growth on the disc or wipes. Nixit provides no specific guidance on antimicrobial maintenance or replacement intervals for the tote.

None known

Heavy metals or dyes in cotton wipes

No recalls or test data documenting lead, cadmium, or azo dye contamination in Nixit wipes have been reported. Cotton textile safety is regulated under OEKO-TEX and Bluesign standards in many manufacturers, but Nixit does not advertise compliance with either certification.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Menstrual Cups

DIVA Cup Model 2

Aisle

DIVA Cup Model 2

Medical-grade silicone (body); no Teflon-type coating or Teflon-family coating coatings

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS1 flag

Lower-concern menstrual cup; silicone construction and PFAS-free commitment make it a reasonable choice.

MADE SAFE Certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Ruby Cup Steriliser

Ruby Cup

Steriliser

Stainless steel heating chamber with silicone/plastic components

B
D
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern menstrual cup sterilizer; stainless core typical for appliances, but silicone/plastic parts unspecified, contact brand for material detail.

Risky category by default

Ruby Cup Steriliser Purple

Ruby Cup

Steriliser Purple

stainless steel steriliser/heating element

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

Lower PFAS concern; no high-risk coatings typical of this product category.

Risky category by default

More menstrual cups grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.