Native · Toothpaste
Natura Siberica Natural Arctic Protection Toothpaste
Lower-concern buy, toothpaste formulations rarely use PFAS, but brand offers no transparency.
Natura Siberica toothpaste is an aqueous cosmetic with no known PFAS-prone ingredients like waterproofing agents or nonstick coatings. The brand makes no PFAS claims and provides no third-party testing data.
Shop Native on Amazon →Material
aqueous toothpaste gel with mineral abrasives
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Natura Siberica Arctic Protection is an aqueous gel toothpaste formulated with mineral abrasives (likely silica or calcium carbonate), water, and botanical extracts marketed as Arctic-sourced. Toothpastes are rinse-off products with brief oral contact and negligible swallowing risk in normal use, which substantially lowers systemic absorption hazards compared to leave-on cosmetics. The aqueous gel format avoids oil-based or hydrocarbon carriers that can concentrate certain contaminants. Mineral abrasives are inert and do not hydrolyze or degrade into secondary hazards.
The brand's record and disclosure
Natura Siberica (parent brand) positions itself in the natural cosmetics segment and holds ECOCERT and similar third-party certifications for select product lines, signaling ingredient scrutiny, though this specific toothpaste's certification status is not widely documented. The brand does not publish detailed heavy-metal or microplastic testing data for oral products. No major safety recalls or regulatory actions are on public record for this brand's toothpaste line. Ingredient transparency is standard for marketed natural products, though formulae may still contain unlisted fragrance allergens.
How it compares in its category
Toothpastes as a category present lower chemical hazard profiles than leave-on skincare or color cosmetics because of rinsing and minimal absorption. This product's mineral-abrasive base is conventional and carries no elevated risk versus mainstream fluoride or non-fluoride toothpastes. Natural-positioned brands like Natura Siberica typically avoid proven problematic ingredients (e.g., triclosan, which was restricted in the US), but often lack the regulatory scrutiny and third-party testing depth of dermatologically-formulated medical toothpastes. Botanical extract inclusion is marketing-driven; clinical benefit over standard formulations is not established.
If you buy it
Use as directed (pea-sized amount, spit out, do not swallow). Check the printed ingredient list for personal fragrance sensitivities, as some botanical extracts can trigger contact dermatitis in sensitive mucosa. Store in a cool, dry place to prevent lid loosening or microbial growth in residual moisture. Replace every 2-3 months or when the tube is depleted; toothpaste does not harden or degrade significantly over time if sealed. If you have gum disease or open oral wounds, patch-test or consult a dentist before regular use.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Formaldehyde releasers or preservative allergens
Aqueous toothpaste gels typically use quaternary preservatives or sodium benzoate; natural-branded products sometimes substitute botanical antimicrobials that may include fragrance aldehydes. No specific testing data for this product is publicly available.
Heavy metals in mineral abrasives
Silica and calcium carbonate abrasives are food-grade materials with established purity standards in cosmetics. No recalls or contamination reports exist for Natura Siberica toothpastes; mineral source (Arctic) does not inherently elevate lead or cadmium risk.
Fragrance allergens and essential oil irritation
Arctic botanical extracts and fragrance compounds are included for sensory appeal but are unlisted at specific concentrations on most packaging. Cinnamon, citrus, and conifer oils common in natural toothpastes can cause contact stomatitis or allergic reactions in susceptible users.
Microplastic microbeads
Natura Siberica marketed as natural does not use plastic microbeads; mineral abrasives are used instead. Regulatory bans on microbeads in toothpaste (EU, US) make this hazard unlikely in branded products.
1,4-dioxane or dioxane precursors
Toothpastes formulated with certain ethoxylated surfactants (e.g., sodium lauryl sulfate derivatives) can carry dioxane contamination from synthesis. Natura Siberica does not disclose surfactant sources; natural-branded products often avoid ethoxylates, but data is not publicly verified.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 78% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Toothpaste
Davids
Toothpaste
natural mineral-based formula (calcium carbonate, hydroxyapatite)
Lower PFAS concern; natural formula toothpaste with clean ingredient transparency.
⚠Risky category by default
Davids
Natural Toothpaste Peppermint Charcoal
Charcoal, glycerin, hydrated silica, natural flavor, mineral base
Lower-concern toothpaste; charcoal formulation has no inherent PFAS risk and carries third-party safety certification.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Native
Fluoride Free Toothpaste
toothpaste base: glycerin, xylitol, silica; fluoride-free formula
Lower PFAS concern; fluoride-free formulation and standard toothpaste ingredients present negligible PFAS risk.
⚠Risky category by default
More toothpaste grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.