40/ 100
F
OverallF24/100
Case Mate Waterproof Floating Pouch

Mpowerd · Waterproof Smartphone Cases

Case Mate Waterproof Floating Pouch

F · High PFAS

Waterproof pouch with unspecified treatment; PFAS risk unknown without disclosure.

Verdict: SkipWaterproof pouch with silent PFAS stance and unspecified water-repellent coating; functional for occasional use but durability and chemical transparency concerns warrant cautious approach.

Mpowerd's floating pouch uses waterproofing chemistry not publicly disclosed. Brand provides no PFAS information, leaving treatment composition unclear.

The safe swap

Mophie Juice Pack Battery Case for iPhone 15

Mophie

Mophie Juice Pack Battery Case for iPhone 15

85/100 safety

B

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned its B.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Waterproof nylon or PVC pouch with unspecified water-repellent coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This pouch uses waterproof nylon or PVC as the base material, coated with an unspecified water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish to achieve its waterproof claim. water-repellent coating coatings historically rely on PFAS-based chemistry, though some manufacturers now use PFAS-free alternatives; Mpowerd has not publicly disclosed which type is used here. The choice between nylon and PVC matters: nylon is generally more stable and recyclable, while PVC can leach plasticizers (phthalates or non-phthalate alternatives) if degraded or heated, and PVC production involves chlorine chemistry with associated environmental concerns.

The brand's record and disclosure

Mpowerd is known for solar-powered consumer products but has not published material safety data sheets, chemical disclosures, or certifications (such as OEKO-TEX or bluesign) for this pouch. The brand's silence on water-repellent coating treatment, material sourcing, and PFAS status is a significant red flag in the waterproof gear category, where transparency has become standard among leading competitors. No formal recalls or documented safety incidents tied to Mpowerd pouches are on record, but the lack of proactive disclosure limits independent verification of safety claims.

How it compares in its category

Waterproof pouches range widely in safety profile. Premium brands (Peak Design, Aqua Quest) openly state PFAS-free water-repellent coating or use wax-based coatings and publish test certifications. Budget alternatives often use generic PVC with unknown additives or unspecified PFAS-based coatings, similar to this Mpowerd pouch. Mid-tier competitors typically offer nylon with disclosed non-PFAS coatings at comparable or lower prices. This product sits in the middle-to-lower transparency zone, offering functional waterproofing but lacking the disclosure rigor of market leaders.

If you buy it

Use the pouch for occasional water protection (phones, documents in rain or splash scenarios) rather than prolonged or repeated submersion, which can degrade coatings and increase leaching risk. Avoid exposing it to direct heat or UV for extended periods, as thermal stress can break down the water-repellent coating and potentially release plasticizers if PVC is the base. Store it dry and inspect regularly for coating wear (whitening, peeling, or stiffness are signs of degradation). If the material or smell changes noticeably, discontinue use; replacement is inexpensive enough to prioritize safety over sunk cost.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

water-repellent coating (PFAS or non-PFAS, unspecified)

Waterproof pouches typically rely on water-repellent coating coatings to achieve water resistance; without brand disclosure, it is unknown whether this uses legacy PFAS formulations or newer alternatives. Any degradation of the coating over time may increase skin or item contact with residual treatment chemicals.

Possible

Phthalate or alternative plasticizers (if PVC construction)

If the base material is PVC (not confirmed but common in budget waterproof pouches), it contains plasticizers to maintain flexibility. Modern products often use non-phthalate alternatives, but Mpowerd's lack of material specification leaves this uncertain. Heat, UV, and extended contact with oils or solvents can accelerate leaching.

Possible

Microplastics from coating or substrate wear

Nylon or PVC pouches shed microfibers over time, especially if the water-repellent coating degrades or the material is repeatedly flexed. Items stored inside (food, reusable water containers) may accumulate microscopic particles if the pouch interior is compromised or unlined.

None known

Unspecified adhesives or stitching treatments

Waterproof pouches are often sealed or reinforced with adhesives and treated thread; Mpowerd has not disclosed the chemistry of these components. Standard industry practice suggests they are likely low-risk, but independent verification is absent.

Possible

Odor or volatile off-gassing on first use

New waterproof pouches sometimes emit chemical smells from residual coating solvents or processing chemicals. If the smell is strong or persistent after airing, it may indicate incomplete curing or unusual solvent use; ventilate and avoid storing food or sensitive items until the smell dissipates.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 40% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Smartphone Cases

Mophie Juice Pack Battery Case for iPhone 15

Mophie

Juice Pack Battery Case for iPhone 15

Lithium-ion battery, plastic housing, metal contacts

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

No known PFAS use; battery cases rarely require fluorinated coatings.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Mophie Juice Pack Battery Case for iPhone 15 Pro

Mophie

Juice Pack Battery Case for iPhone 15 Pro

Lithium-ion battery, plastic housing, rubber grips

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern. Battery cases lack typical PFAS-prone coatings; no public disclosure available.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Pelican Shield Phone Case for Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus

Pelican

Shield Phone Case for Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus

Polycarbonate shell, rubber grip

B
D
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS4 flags

Lower concern; typical phone case with no known PFAS applications.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More waterproof smartphone cases grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.