Mitchum · Deodorant
Mitchum Women's Unscented Anti-Perspirant Deodorant Roll-On
Lower-concern personal care; no known PFAS triggers, but brand silent on ingredient sourcing.
Mitchum's unscented roll-on antiperspirant uses conventional aluminum-based active ingredients with no reported Teflon-family coating coatings, waterproofing treatments, or nonstick finishes that would warrant PFAS use. The brand makes no PFAS claims or disclosures. No public lab testing or regulatory action found.
Shop Mitchum on Amazon →Material
Water-based aluminum chlorohydrate + starch/talc base, roll-on applicator
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Mitchum uses aluminum chlorohydrate as its active antiperspirant agent, a salt form that works by forming plugs in sweat ducts. The formulation includes starch and/or talc as absorbent bases to manage moisture and texture. Being water-based rather than silicone-based means lower volatility and simpler rinsing, though talc specifically carries historical contamination risks (see hazards). The unscented variant avoids fragrance allergens, reducing irritation potential versus scented versions.
The brand's record and disclosure
Mitchum (owned by Revlon) does not publish detailed ingredient sourcing or manufacturing transparency reports, and has not made public commitments to PFAS phase-out. No major product recalls or safety controversies specific to this line are on record. The brand follows FDA compliance for antiperspirant active ingredients but does not exceed standard disclosure norms for the mass-market deodorant segment.
How it compares in its category
Mitchum is a mainstream antiperspirant positioned mid-market; aluminum chlorohydrate is the most common antiperspirant active globally and is considered safe by FDA and dermatological bodies at concentrations under 20%. This unscented formulation avoids fragrance allergens that affect many competitors. It is more conventional (and slightly less transparent) than premium brands like Lavanila or Kopari, which publish fuller ingredient chains, but comparable in safety profile to drugstore alternatives like Degree or Secret.
If you buy it
Apply only to clean, dry skin to minimize irritation and ensure efficacy. Do not use on broken or irritated skin. Replace the roll-on if the applicator becomes visibly contaminated or the formula dries out (typically 6-12 months of regular use). Store in a cool, dry place away from heat, as the water-based formula can separate or degrade if exposed to temperatures above 30C (86F).
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Talc contamination (if present in base)
Mitchum formulations may include talc as an absorbent filler. Historical talc from mining sites can contain asbestos fibers; modern pharmaceutical-grade talc is processed to remove asbestos, but the FDA does not mandate pre-market certification. Risk is low with typical underarm use (not on lungs), but inhalation during application should be minimized.
Aluminum absorption and systemic accumulation
Aluminum chlorohydrate does not penetrate intact skin significantly; plasma levels from antiperspirant use remain below levels associated with any known toxicity. No established link between topical antiperspirant aluminum and Alzheimer's or other diseases in peer-reviewed epidemiology. FDA considers aluminum in antiperspirants safe at approved concentrations.
Skin sensitization and irritation
Aluminum chlorohydrate can trigger mild contact dermatitis or irritation in sensitive individuals, especially on freshly shaved or broken skin. The unscented formulation reduces fragrance allergen risk but does not eliminate potential irritation from the active ingredient or preservatives used in the water-based base.
Preservative allergens (typical to water-based formulas)
Water-based deodorants require preservatives to prevent microbial growth; Mitchum typically uses parabens or phenoxyethanol. These are allowed in cosmetics but trigger contact sensitization in a small subset of users. The product label should list preservatives; test on a small area first if you have sensitive skin or a history of cosmetic reactions.
Roll-on applicator contamination
Roll-on ball applicators can harbor bacteria if shared or if moisture is trapped in the housing. Ensure the cap seals tightly and do not allow the ball to remain wet. Replace if you notice odor from the applicator itself, which signals microbial colonization.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Deodorant
Tom's of Maine
Deodorant
mineral-based, baking soda formulation
Lower concern, mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.
⚠Risky category by default
Tom's of Maine
Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle
mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation
Lower-concern deodorant; mineral-based formula with PFAS-free claim aligns with brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.
⚠Risky category by default
Tom's of Maine
Antiperspirant Deodorant
mineral-based active ingredients, plant-derived botanicals, no synthetic water-repellent coatings
Lower PFAS concern, mineral-based formula with MADE SAFE cert; antiperspirant category has minimal waterproof-coating risk.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
More deodorant grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.