Mitchum · Deodorant
Mitchum Women's Advanced Control Shower Fresh Gel Antiperspirant & Deodorant Twin Pack
Lower concern; cosmetic gel unlikely to require PFAS, but Mitchum offers no transparency.
Mitchum's gel antiperspirant does not list PFAS-typical additives (Teflon-type coating, Teflon-family coating, aqueous film-forming coatings) in disclosed formulations. Antiperspirant gels typically rely on aluminum salts and silicones rather than fluorinated compounds.
Shop Mitchum on Amazon →Material
gel antiperspirant/deodorant; hydrocarbon and silicone base
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Mitchum's gel antiperspirant uses a hydrocarbon and silicone base typical of modern gel formulations, designed to deliver aluminum chlorohydrate (the active antiperspirant) without the greasiness of older cream forms. Gel matrices reduce irritant contact time compared to stick formulas and are less prone to bacterial colonization during storage. The silicone and hydrocarbon carriers are inert cosmetic standards with minimal skin penetration risk at intended use levels.
The brand's record and disclosure
Mitchum, owned by Revlon, publishes ingredient lists but does not provide detailed safety certifications, third-party testing, or explicit PFAS policy statements. No major recalls or safety controversies specific to Mitchum deodorants are documented in FDA or consumer databases. The brand's silence on PFAS and broader chemical transparency reflects industry norm rather than a red flag, but contrasts with competitors (e.g., Schmidt's) offering fuller ingredient sourcing disclosure.
How it compares in its category
Mitchum's gel antiperspirant occupies the mainstream safety middle: safer than some budget stick brands with higher heavy-metal contamination risk, but less transparent than premium natural or certified alternatives. Aluminum chlorohydrate strength is comparable to competitors like Secret and Degree. Gel formulas in general carry lower dermal irritation profiles than older cream or powder forms.
If you buy it
Apply to dry underarm skin and allow 30 seconds to fully dry before dressing to prevent spotting and maximize efficacy. Store in cool, dry conditions away from direct sunlight to prevent silicone separation. Do not use on broken or irritated skin; if redness or burning occurs, rinse and discontinue. Gel formulas typically last 24 months unopened; replace if separation or odor changes occur.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Aluminum salts (systemic absorption from antiperspirant)
Aluminum chlorohydrate is the active ingredient in this antiperspirant. Scientific consensus from FDA and dermatology bodies finds topical antiperspirant aluminum absorption to be minimal at approved concentrations, but cumulative lifetime exposure remains incompletely studied. This product carries typical antiperspirant risk, not elevated.
Fragrance allergens (Shower Fresh scent blend)
Mitchum lists 'fragrance' as a single ingredient without component disclosure. Fragrance blends commonly contain limonene, linalool, and other common contact allergens. Approximately 1-3 percent of the population experience fragrance-related dermatitis; unscented alternatives are available if sensitivity is known.
Formaldehyde or formaldehyde-releasing preservatives
Mitchum's published ingredient lists do not indicate formaldehyde releasers (e.g., DMDM hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea) are present in this formula. Silicone and hydrocarbon bases are naturally antimicrobial, reducing preservative burden.
Talc contamination
This is a gel formula, not a powder, so talc-related mineral contamination or asbestos risk does not apply. Talc concerns are specific to powder deodorants and body powders.
Heavy metals in pigments or mineral additives
Gel antiperspirants do not typically include colorants or mineral fillers at meaningful concentrations. No documented recalls or testing results indicate lead, cadmium, or arsenic contamination in Mitchum formulas.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Deodorant
Tom's of Maine
Deodorant
mineral-based, baking soda formulation
Lower concern, mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.
⚠Risky category by default
Tom's of Maine
Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle
mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation
Lower-concern deodorant; mineral-based formula with PFAS-free claim aligns with brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.
⚠Risky category by default
Tom's of Maine
Antiperspirant Deodorant
mineral-based active ingredients, plant-derived botanicals, no synthetic water-repellent coatings
Lower PFAS concern, mineral-based formula with MADE SAFE cert; antiperspirant category has minimal waterproof-coating risk.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
More deodorant grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.