20/ 100
F
OverallF0/100
Merrell Women's Moab 3

Merrell · Hiking Shoes & Trail Runners

Merrell Women's Moab 3

F · High PFAS

Popular hiking shoe; no PFAS disclosure from Merrell

Verdict: SkipMerrell Moab 3 is a mainstream hiking shoe with no documented chemical hazards beyond typical water-repellent coating treatments; PFAS disclosure gap is the only material concern.

Merrell does not publicly disclose PFAS-free status or testing for Moab 3. The waterproof treatment on this hiking shoe likely contains water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating), which historically used PFAS compounds.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Mesh textile upper, rubber sole, likely water-repellent coating-treated

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Moab 3 upper is mesh textile (likely polyester/nylon blend) bonded to a rubber outsole, with suede/synthetic leather overlays for structure. The mesh is almost certainly treated with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating, which in budget-to-mid-range hiking shoes is commonly fluorocarbon-based (PFAS-containing) rather than fluorine-free. No published material safety data sheet from Merrell specifies the water-repellent coating chemistry. The rubber sole is likely standard vulcanized rubber without added hazardous flame retardants or heavy metal accelerators, though independent verification is unavailable.

The brand's record and disclosure

Merrell (owned by Wolverine World Wide) has not made public commitments to PFAS phase-out or fluorine-free water-repellent coating adoption for footwear, unlike some competitors. The brand provides no material transparency portal or chemical inventory disclosures on product pages. Wolverine faced litigation over per-and-polyfluoroalkyl (PFAS) contamination from foam manufacturing facilities but has not extended transparency to finished footwear labeling. No major product recalls or formaldehyde/azo dye violations are documented for the Moab line.

How it compares in its category

The Moab 3 is a mid-tier hiking shoe. Competitors like Salomon and La Sportiva similarly do not disclose water-repellent coating chemistry on retail listings; high-end brands such as Arc'teryx and some Salewa models have begun specifying PFAS-free treatments. Entry-level brands rarely publish any transparency. The Moab 3 sits in the transparency vacuum typical of mainstream athletic footwear, with no better or worse chemical disclosure than comparable price-point alternatives.

If you buy it

Wash the shoes in cool water (below 40°C) to avoid potential accelerated breakdown of water-repellent coating and adhesives. Avoid machine drying or direct heat; air-dry at room temperature. water-repellent coating treatments typically last 40-80 wears before hydrophobic performance drops; reapplication with commercial water-repellent coating sprays (check the product's own PFAS status) extends life. Inspect adhesive seams annually for peeling, a common failure point in this model that can be sealed with flexible outdoor shoe glue.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Likely

water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating chemistry - PFAS likely but unconfirmed

The mesh upper on the Moab 3 requires water-repellent coating treatment for function. Merrell does not disclose whether the treatment is fluorocarbon-based (PFAS-containing) or fluorine-free. Given the brand's lack of public PFAS commitments and the prevalence of legacy fluorocarbon water-repellent coating in mid-range footwear, PFAS-containing treatment is probable but not independently verified for this specific model.

None known

Formaldehyde resins in textile finishes

No formaldehyde-releasing finishes (wrinkle resistance, sizing) are standard in modern athletic mesh uppers. Merrell's manufacturing standards appear consistent with industry practice, which avoids high-formaldehyde textile resins. No recalls or testing data suggest a problem with this product line.

Possible

Azo dyes in mesh and overlay materials

The Moab 3 is available in multiple colors (grey, brown, teal, etc.). Synthetic dyes in low-cost mesh can include azo compounds restricted under REACH, though major footwear brands typically comply with EU/California restrictions. Merrell's compliance audits are not public, leaving this as an unverified but standard category risk.

Possible

Adhesive off-gassing and polyurethane breakdown

The shoe's mesh-to-midsole and overlay bonds likely use polyurethane adhesives. New shoes may emit volatile organic compounds (VOCs) for the first few wears; this is typical and diminishes rapidly with air exposure. No evidence of excessive off-gassing in user reports, but individual sensitivity varies.

None known

Rubber sole degradation and leachables

Vulcanized rubber soles in the Moab 3 do not typically leach heavy metals or hazardous additives at typical use temperatures. No published data or recalls indicate contamination from sole materials.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More hiking shoes & trail runners grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.