Lume · Deodorant
Lume Invisible Cream Whole Body Deodorant
Lower concern; no PFAS triggers in formulation, but brand hasn't transparently addressed it.
Lume's invisible cream deodorant is a water-based cosmetic with silicones and mineral ingredients, no nonstick coatings, water-repellent coating treatments, or water-resistant coatings typical of PFAS products. No public lab testing or PFAS-free certification exists.
Shop Lume on Amazon →Material
Water-based cream; cyclopentasiloxane, dimethicone, starch, mineral pigments
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Lume Invisible Cream is a water-based formulation built on cyclopentasiloxane (a silicone that dries quickly and leaves no residue) and dimethicone (another silicone for smoothness), plus starch for absorption and mineral pigments for color. This chemistry avoids aluminum salts and talc, common concerns in antiperspirants and powders. The water base means no alcohol harshness, and silicones in cosmetics are established as low-migration, low-toxicity ingredients at approved concentrations.
The brand's record and disclosure
Lume has built marketing around transparency (no aluminum, no talc, no baking soda) but has not published formal safety certifications (EWG verification, Dermatologically Tested claims are standard for competitors). The brand does not publicly address PFAS, though the disclosed ingredients carry no documented PFAS triggers. No major safety recalls or substantiated allegations of harm are on record for this product line.
How it compares in its category
Lume sits in the premium natural-leaning deodorant space alongside brands like Native and Schmidt's. Unlike many conventional antiperspirants, it omits aluminum chloride (which prevents sweating but raises bioaccumulation questions). Compared to talc-based powders, the starch-silicone blend reduces inhalation risk. Fragrance allergen load appears comparable to mainstream options.
If you buy it
Apply to clean, dry skin; cream deodorants benefit from skin moisture balance, so avoid over-application in very humid climates where it may pill. Store below 25°C to preserve texture; silicones are stable but can separate in heat. Replace every 6 months or when odor control declines. Patch-test if you have sensitive skin, as fragrance or starch may trigger contact dermatitis in rare cases.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Fragrance allergens and sensitizers
Lume uses proprietary fragrance blends; full ingredient disclosure of fragrance components is not provided on label or website. Individuals with fragrance sensitivity should request full INCIs or perform patch testing, though reported adverse events are not established for this brand.
Mineral pigment heavy metal content
Lume discloses use of mineral pigments for color but does not specify sources or heavy metal testing (lead, cadmium, arsenic limits). Mineral pigments in cosmetics are regulated, and no contamination has been reported for this product; however, third-party testing is not publicly available.
Silicone dermal accumulation
Cyclopentasiloxane and dimethicone are not bioaccumulative at skin application rates, but individuals with severe silicone sensitivity should avoid. No clinical evidence of harm at cosmetic use levels; concern is theoretical for very frequent, high-volume users.
Starch and bacterial or fungal growth
Starch can theoretically support microbial growth if the product becomes damp or contaminated. Proper storage (dry, sealed container) and hand hygiene during application mitigate risk. No documented cases of infection linked to Lume products.
Formaldehyde releasers or preservatives
No formaldehyde-releasing preservatives (DMDM hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea) appear in disclosed ingredients. Preservative system is not fully detailed; standard cosmetic preservatives used do not carry formaldehyde risk at permitted levels.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Deodorant
Tom's of Maine
Deodorant
mineral-based, baking soda formulation
Lower concern, mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.
⚠Risky category by default
Tom's of Maine
Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle
mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation
Lower-concern deodorant; mineral-based formula with PFAS-free claim aligns with brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.
⚠Risky category by default
Tom's of Maine
Antiperspirant Deodorant
mineral-based active ingredients, plant-derived botanicals, no synthetic water-repellent coatings
Lower PFAS concern, mineral-based formula with MADE SAFE cert; antiperspirant category has minimal waterproof-coating risk.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
More deodorant grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.