75/ 100
C
OverallF53/100
Lume Deodorant Plus Sweat Control Antiperspirant Deodorant Fresh Spring

Lume · Deodorant

Lume Deodorant Plus Sweat Control Antiperspirant Deodorant Fresh Spring

C · Moderate

Lower PFAS concern; typical cosmetic formulation with no known PFAS triggers, but zero brand transparency.

Verdict: BuyTalc-free mineral powder base with standard aluminum compounds; no established safety red flags; typical cosmetic transparency; lower-risk choice in category.

Lume's deodorant-antiperspirant is a water-based cream/gel product with no apparent water-repellent coating treatment, nonstick coating, or grease-resistant finish, categories most likely to use PFAS. The brand makes no PFAS claims or disclosures. Aluminium salts are standard antiperspirant actives unrelated to PFAS.

Shop Lume on Amazon →

Material

aqua-based gel/cream with talc-free mineral powder and aluminium compounds

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Lume Plus is an aqueous gel-cream base combined with talc-free mineral powder and aluminum compounds (likely aluminum zirconium or aluminum chlorohydrate), which are standard antiperspirant actives used to block sweat ducts. The absence of talc removes a historical contamination concern (talc sourced near asbestos deposits can carry trace asbestos fibers), making this formulation lower-risk than older powder deodorants. Aqua-based gels are generally gentler than alcohol-heavy formulations and less likely to trigger skin irritation in sensitive users.

The brand's record and disclosure

Lume has marketed itself as a 'natural' and 'clinically tested' deodorant but provides minimal public ingredient transparency beyond marketing claims; no third-party certifications (organic, EWG Verified, etc.) are visible. No major recalls or established safety controversies are on record for this product line. The brand has not made explicit public statements about PFAS screening or heavy-metal testing, which is typical for mid-market personal care brands but falls short of industry leaders in transparency.

How it compares in its category

Lume Plus sits in the mid-market antiperspirant category, comparable to Schmidt's Naturals or Secret brands in formulation risk profile. It avoids talc (an advantage over many legacy brands) and uses standard aluminum salts rather than novel chemistry, making it a conventional choice. Most deodorants in this tier carry similar or higher PFAS exposure risk and comparable disclosure gaps; Lume's aqua-based approach is slightly more skin-friendly than aerosol or alcohol-dominant competitors.

If you buy it

Apply sparingly to clean, dry skin to minimize irritation and maximize efficacy; do not apply to broken or inflamed skin. Rotate application sites if daily use causes localized irritation. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat, as cream-based formulas can separate or degrade if exposed to high temperatures. Discontinue use if rash, itching, or persistent irritation develops; patch-test on inner arm first if you have sensitive skin or aluminum sensitivity.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Aluminum salts (systemic absorption)

Aluminum chlorohydrate and aluminum zirconium are standard antiperspirant actives with decades of regulatory approval (FDA generally recognized as safe for this use). However, chronic dermal absorption through repeated daily application remains theoretically possible in sensitive individuals or if skin barrier is compromised; evidence of systemic toxicity from topical antiperspirant use is not est

Possible

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Lume's 'Fresh Spring' scent is undisclosed in ingredient lists (fragrance compounds are typically protected trade secrets in cosmetics). Common fragrance components include linalool, limonene, and other volatile organics that can trigger allergic contact dermatitis or respiratory sensitivity in 1-3 percent of users; unscented variants carry minimal risk.

None known

Formaldehyde releasers

No known formaldehyde or formaldehyde-donor preservatives are listed in Lume's ingredient disclosure. Aqua-based formulations typically use parabens or phenoxyethanol as preservatives, which do not release formaldehyde; however, full preservative system is not publicly detailed.

Possible

Heavy metals in mineral powder

Talc-free mineral powders (often mica, silica, or other naturally derived minerals) can carry trace heavy metals like lead or cadmium depending on ore source; Lume does not publish third-party heavy-metal test results. This is a general concern for mineral-based cosmetics, not Lume-specific, but transparency would mitigate risk perception.

Reported

Skin irritation or sensitization with repeated use

Online consumer reviews document occasional localized irritation, rash, or itching in a small minority of users; this is typical for antiperspirant products and does not indicate a systemic safety failure. Irritation is usually reversible upon discontinuation and is not associated with the formulation specifically but rather individual skin sensitivity to aluminum salts or fragrance.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower concern, mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower-concern deodorant; mineral-based formula with PFAS-free claim aligns with brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Antiperspirant Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Antiperspirant Deodorant

mineral-based active ingredients, plant-derived botanicals, no synthetic water-repellent coatings

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower PFAS concern, mineral-based formula with MADE SAFE cert; antiperspirant category has minimal waterproof-coating risk.

MADE SAFE CertifiedLeaping Bunny (cruelty-free)

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.