PFAS score
Lakeland · Pressure Cookers
Sweet - 6QT Electric Pressure Cooker, 12-in-1 Stainless Steel Multi-Cooker with Digital Display, Silvery - Silver
Lower PFAS concern; stainless steel construction poses minimal risk, but lack of transparency on any interior coatings limits certainty.
This electric pressure cooker uses stainless steel as its primary cooking surface, which is a low-risk material for PFAS. However, Lakeland provides no public disclosure about PFAS or any non-stick or water-resistant treatments on interior surfaces or seals.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Stainless steel inner pot, electric heating element
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Stain-resistant finish
Stain-resistant finishes are a common PFAS use.
Category baseline
cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Pressure Cookers
Zavor
LUX Edge 6-Qt. Multicooker Cookbook
Paper/cardboard cookbook; not cookware
Not applicable, this is a cookbook, not cookware hardware.
⚠Risky category by default
Presto
23 Quart Induction Pressure Canner
Stainless steel and aluminum construction
Lower PFAS concern, stainless/aluminum pressure canner with no nonstick coating.
⚠Risky category by default
All American
Aluminum Pressure Cooker IMUSA
aluminum with stainless steel interior
Lower PFAS concern, non-coated aluminum/stainless cooker, but brand makes no PFAS statement.
⚠Risky category by default
More pressure cookers grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.