Komax · Food Storage Containers
Komax Biokips Spaghetti Container Storage Noodle/pasta 4.3 X 10.7
Lower-concern food storage; no known PFAS risk, but brand offers no transparency.
Komax Biokips containers are plastic food-storage vessels with no reported PFAS treatments. Food-contact plastics like polypropylene typically carry lower PFAS risk than coated or water-repellent items.
Shop Komax on Amazon →Material
Plastic (polypropylene or similar food-grade resin)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Komax Biokips containers are injection-molded polypropylene (PP, #5 resin), a thermoplastic chosen for food storage because it has a high melting point (around 130°C) and does not typically leach BPA or phthalates at room temperature. PP is considered one of the safer plastics for food contact by regulatory agencies including the FDA and EU. The rigid, stackable design of this pasta container minimizes flex and stress points that could accelerate degradation over time.
The brand's record and disclosure
Komax is a kitchenware company with a modest but clean public record; no major recalls or toxicity incidents are documented for this product line. The brand does not publish detailed material sourcing or manufacturing transparency reports, nor does it explicitly certify against specific chemical hazards. No public PFAS testing or stance has been issued by Komax, placing it in the silent-but-not-concerning category for this emerging hazard class.
How it compares in its category
This container sits in the mid-tier of plastic pasta storage. Glass alternatives (e.g., Pyrex, OXO glass containers) eliminate polymer leaching entirely but are heavier and breakable. Premium brands like Rubbermaid often market similar PP designs with identical safety profiles. Budget containers from unrecognized manufacturers carry higher uncertainty; Komax's established retail presence and lack of adverse history make it a reasonable choice within the plastic category.
If you buy it
Store dry pasta and similar shelf-stable items only; do not use for hot liquids or in the oven, as PP softens above 100°C. Hand wash rather than dishwasher when possible to reduce thermal stress and scratching. Inspect the container every 1-2 years for cloudiness, cracks, or warping, which signal polymer breakdown; replace if any develop. Keep away from prolonged direct sunlight to slow photo-oxidation of the plastic.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
BPA/BPS leaching
Polypropylene (#5) does not contain BPA or BPS as manufacturing additives under current FDA guidance. No recalls or testing reports indicate BPA contamination in Komax Biokips containers.
Phthalate plasticizers
Food-grade polypropylene is not typically plasticized with phthalates; this hazard is more relevant to soft PVC. Komax containers show no reported phthalate issues in available literature.
Microplastics and degradation
Polypropylene can fragment into microparticles if repeatedly scratched, cracked, or heated above its melting point. Risk is low with normal use (room-temperature dry storage), but increases if the container is damaged or misused with hot contents.
Coating or ink migration
Komax containers typically use printed labels or logos; no toxicity reports exist for inks used, though labels should not contact food directly. Internal surfaces are uncoated plastic.
Mold or bacterial growth
Any food storage container can harbor bacteria or mold if improperly sealed, stored in humid conditions, or not cleaned thoroughly. This is a use and hygiene issue, not a material safety defect specific to Komax.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Food Storage Containers
Caraway
Food Storage Set
Glass containers with plastic lids
Lower concern; glass + plastic lids with stated PFAS-free position, but no third-party verification of lid material.
⚠Risky category by default
Caraway
Home 9-Piece Mini Food Storage Set
Borosilicate glass containers with plastic lids
Lower-concern option; glass containers avoid PFAS coatings, but verify lid material before purchase.
⚠Risky category by default
Caraway
Cream 6.6-Cup Non-Stick Glass Food Storage Container with Lid
borosilicate glass with non-PFAS lid
Lower PFAS concern, glass container with stated non-PFAS lid, though third-party verification absent.
⚠Risky category by default
More food storage containers grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.