70/ 100
C
OverallF52/100
Komax Biokips Large Food Storage Container

Komax · Food Storage Containers

Komax Biokips Large Food Storage Container

C · Moderate

Lower-concern option; rigid plastic food containers rarely require PFAS, but brand silence limits certainty.

Verdict: BuyPolypropylene rigid container with no established safety issues; brand silence on PFAS acceptable for this material class.

Komax Biokips containers are rigid food storage made from standard thermoplastics (likely polypropylene), which typically do not require PFAS coatings or treatments. The brand provides no public PFAS disclosure or certifications, leaving confidence moderate rather than high.

Shop Komax on Amazon →

Material

polypropylene (PP) or similar thermoplastic container

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Komax Biokips containers are polypropylene (PP, #5 plastic), a thermoplastic chosen for food storage because it resists cracking and has a higher melting point (around 130°C) than many alternatives. PP does not require PFAS for water or grease resistance in rigid food containers. The material is generally considered stable at room temperature and tolerates repeated hot fills and dishwasher cycles better than lower-grade plastics.

The brand's record and disclosure

Komax is a private-label brand sold primarily through grocery and home goods retail chains (notably Costco). The brand has not published explicit material safety certifications, third-party testing reports, or PFAS avoidance statements. No product recalls or safety controversies are on record for Biokips containers. The brand's silence on PFAS and material sourcing is typical for budget-tier plastic storage; it does not indicate a hazard but reflects low transparency.

How it compares in its category

Rigid PP food containers are among the safer options for storage; glass and stainless steel exceed them only in chemical inertness. Komax Biokips sits at the budget end of this category alongside similar store-branded options (Rubbermaid Brilliance, Pyrex Snapware). Unlike some ultra-cheap containers, Komax has not been flagged for elevated migration of contaminants, though independent lab testing of this specific product is not published.

If you buy it

Keep containers below 130°C; hot foods should cool slightly before storage to avoid warping the lid seal. Avoid prolonged storage of acidic foods (vinegar, citrus, tomato) as PP can slowly release trace oligomers under stress, though migration at typical kitchen temperatures is minimal. Inspect lids quarterly for cloudiness, cracks, or discoloration; replace if visible degradation occurs. Hand-wash lids to extend seal life, as dishwasher heat accelerates polymer fatigue.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Oligomer and monomer leaching (polypropylene)

PP containers can release trace amounts of oligomers (short polymer chains) and unreacted propylene monomer under thermal stress or prolonged contact with fatty or acidic foods. At typical kitchen storage temperatures, migration is minimal and well below regulatory limits, but heating repeatedly or storing aggressive foods may increase risk over years of use.

None known

BPA/BPS contamination

Polypropylene does not require bisphenol A or analogues as a plasticizer or manufacturing input. No credible reports of BPA or BPS detection in Komax Biokips containers exist; PP is considered BPA-free by material class.

None known

Phthalate plasticizers

Rigid polypropylene does not rely on phthalate esters for flexibility; these additives are primarily used in soft PVC and some polyethylene films. Komax Biokips, as a rigid container, is not expected to contain phthalates, though no brand-specific testing result has been published.

Reported

Lid seal and closure degradation

User reviews and general feedback on budget PP container lids frequently note loss of seal integrity over 1, 3 years of dishwasher use. Komax Biokips lids are not uniquely vulnerable, but lid replacement is a known wear item; loss of seal may allow food odor transfer or, rarely, microbial growth if containers are left warm and closed.

Possible

Microplastic shedding under thermal cycling

Repeated heating and cooling of rigid PP can induce micro-fracturing over time. While catastrophic shedding is unlikely at normal kitchen temperatures, prolonged use (5+ years) with frequent hot-fill or dishwasher cycles may generate trace particulates, though no peer-reviewed data confirms significant human health risk from storage container microplastics at this level.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Food Storage Containers

Caraway Food Storage Set

Caraway

Food Storage Set

Glass containers with plastic lids

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower concern; glass + plastic lids with stated PFAS-free position, but no third-party verification of lid material.

Risky category by default

Caraway Home 9-Piece Mini Food Storage Set

Caraway

Home 9-Piece Mini Food Storage Set

Borosilicate glass containers with plastic lids

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern option; glass containers avoid PFAS coatings, but verify lid material before purchase.

Risky category by default

Caraway Cream 6.6-Cup Non-Stick Glass Food Storage Container with Lid

Caraway

Cream 6.6-Cup Non-Stick Glass Food Storage Container with Lid

borosilicate glass with non-PFAS lid

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS4 flags

Lower PFAS concern, glass container with stated non-PFAS lid, though third-party verification absent.

Risky category by default

More food storage containers grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.