25/ 100
F
OverallF17/100
Katbite Butcher Paper Roll

Katom · Grease-Resistant Paper Goods

Katbite Butcher Paper Roll

F · High PFAS

Butcher paper likely coated for grease resistance; PFAS risk unclear without disclosure.

Verdict: SkipButcher paper is lower-risk for food contact, but grease-resistant coating chemistry is undisclosed; use for cold/room-temp foods only.

Katbite butcher paper is standard food-contact packaging with grease-resistant treatment. Brand does not disclose coating chemistry or PFAS status; typical for this category but limits certainty.

The safe swap

Kraft Paper Roll

Katom

Kraft Paper Roll

70/100 safety

C

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Butcher paper with grease-resistant coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Katbite butcher paper is cellulose-based paper with an applied grease-resistant coating. The coating formulation is not publicly disclosed by the brand, which is the core concern: grease resistance in food-contact paper is traditionally achieved with fluorinated compounds (PFAS) or wax/mineral oil. Cellulose itself is inert, but the coating's chemistry determines leaching risk during contact with fatty foods or heat.

The brand's record and disclosure

Katbite (Katom) does not publish material safety data sheets, chemical composition details, or third-party certifications for this product. The brand has not made public statements about PFAS avoidance or alternative coating chemistry. No recalls or documented safety incidents are on record for this specific product, but the absence of transparency is a weakness that prevents full hazard assessment.

How it compares in its category

Standard butcher paper and deli paper carry similar undisclosed coating risks; many commercial rolls use PFAS-based treatments. Some premium brands (e.g., If You Care, Regency) explicitly market PFAS-free formulations using wax or mineral oil alternatives. Katbite pricing is competitive but lower than certified PFAS-free options, consistent with less rigorous supplier vetting.

If you buy it

Reserve use for cold or room-temperature food wrapping and dry storage; avoid direct contact with hot fatty foods, which accelerate leaching from coatings. Do not microwave or use in oven. Replace rolls if visible yellowing, brittleness, or grease saturation occurs. Consider switching to certified PFAS-free brands if budget allows, given the brand's silence on coating materials.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Fluorinated grease-resistant coating (PFAS proxy)

Grease resistance in untreated paper typically requires fluorinated chemistry; Katbite does not disclose whether their coating uses PFAS, PFAS alternatives, or wax. Contact with fatty or oily foods at elevated temperature increases potential for chemical migration.

None known

Mineral oil or wax coating contamination

If the coating is mineral-oil-based rather than fluorinated, it could include alkanes and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; no testing data exists for Katbite specifically. Food contact migration would be minimal under cold/room-temperature use.

None known

Ink or pigment residue on printed side

Butcher paper rolls often have printed text or branding; Katbite product images show minimal ink. No recalls or complaints for ink migration are documented, but direct contact of printed surface with food is best avoided.

Possible

Coating degradation and microparticle shedding

Repeated folding, wetting, or heat exposure can cause the coating to crack or peel, releasing particles into food. This is a general risk for coated paper products and worsens if coating chemistry is not optimized for durability.

None known

Bleach or chlorine residue in paper pulp

Commercial paper is typically chlorine-bleached; residual chlorine compounds are rare in food-contact paper but not explicitly ruled out. No disclosure from Katbite on pulp treatment. Risk is low for room-temperature storage.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Grease-Resistant Paper Goods

Kraft Paper Roll

Katom

Kraft Paper Roll

Kraft paper, uncoated

C
F
PFASAll
C · Moderate2 flags

Lower concern. Uncoated kraft paper is inherently PFAS-free material.

Risky category by default

Idl Packaging White Butcher Paper 18" x Natural Butcher Paper Roll for Meat and Fish

Katom

Idl Packaging White Butcher Paper 18" x Natural Butcher Paper Roll for Meat and Fish

bleached paper, uncoated

C
F
PFASAll
C · Moderate2 flags

Lower concern. Plain paper butcher wrap typically PFAS-free.

Risky category by default

Kraft Paper Sheets 24x24 / Without Center Cut / 500 Sheets per Case

Katom

Kraft Paper Sheets 24x24 / Without Center Cut / 500 Sheets per Case

Kraft paper, uncoated

C
F
PFASAll
C · Moderate3 flags

Lower concern. Bare kraft paper rarely requires PFAS coatings.

Risky category by default

More grease-resistant paper goods grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.