75/ 100
C
OverallC71/100
Dental Floss, Nylon, Waxed, 200 yd., DAR48058

Isodent · Dental Floss

Dental Floss, Nylon, Waxed, 200 yd., DAR48058

C · Moderate

Lower-concern option; standard waxed nylon floss unlikely to contain intentional PFAS, but no brand transparency.

Verdict: BuyStandard nylon waxed floss with no established safety issues; PFAS risk low for typical use; brand transparency absent but material class safe.

Waxed nylon dental floss is a conventional product without known PFAS-prone features like water-resistant or stain-resistant treatments. No public disclosure from Isodent about PFAS presence or absence.

Shop Isodent on Amazon →

Material

Nylon filament, wax coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This floss is nylon filament (polyamide polymer) coated with wax, a common dental floss construction. Nylon is a synthetic polymer chosen for strength and flexibility; the wax coating (typically paraffin, beeswax, or candelilla wax) aids gliding between teeth and does not enter the bloodstream because floss is not swallowed in normal use. The nylon filament itself is chemically inert when used as intended and poses no known leaching risk during oral contact.

The brand's record and disclosure

Isodent has not published transparency statements or third-party certifications regarding PFAS, heavy metals, or manufacturing controls specific to this product line. No recalls or safety incidents for this SKU (DAR48058) are on public record. The brand maintains a silent posture on ingredient sourcing and testing, which is typical for smaller dental floss manufacturers but limits consumer verification of claims.

How it compares in its category

Waxed nylon floss is the most common floss type globally and carries a lower PFAS concern than newer synthetic alternatives (e.g., some polytetrafluoroethylene-based flosses). It is comparable in safety profile to store-brand equivalents. Unwaxed nylon and silk alternatives exist but offer no material safety advantage; silk is not regulated differently and waxed varieties across brands show similar ingredient profiles.

If you buy it

Use as directed: insert between teeth gently and do not swallow floss fibers. Replace the spool when the floss becomes frayed, shredded, or difficult to handle, or annually if used daily. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to prevent wax degradation. Do not expose to heat or flame, as nylon can melt and wax may soften, though neither hazard applies to normal storage or oral use.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

None known

Nylon filament microabrasion

Properly used waxed nylon floss does not cause clinically significant gum abrasion. Risk of tissue injury is operator-dependent (aggressive flossing technique) rather than product-specific.

None known

Wax coating swallowing/ingestion

Small amounts of wax incidentally swallowed during flossing are non-toxic and pass through the GI tract without absorption. Paraffin, beeswax, and plant waxes are food-grade or food-contact approved by regulatory bodies.

None known

Heavy metals in nylon resin or wax

No recalls or test reports indicate lead, cadmium, or other heavy metals in commercial nylon floss. Dental-grade nylon is not known to be contaminated in finished products, though no brand-specific testing for Isodent DAR48058 is published.

Possible

Allergen contact (fragrance or additives in wax)

If wax coating includes fragrance or dyes, individuals with contact sensitivities may experience gum irritation. Product label does not specify wax type or additives; contact Isodent directly if history of oral product sensitivity exists.

None known

Spool contamination or degradation

Standard plastic spools (typically polypropylene or polystyrene) do not leach into floss under normal storage. Inspect spool for cracks or discoloration indicating age; replace if stored for more than 3 years.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Dental Floss

Cocofloss Refill Trio

Cocofloss

Refill Trio

Coconut fiber, based floss with plant-based coating

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern dental product; natural materials and transparent PFAS stance, but no independent verification.

Risky category by default

Refillable Silk Dental Floss

Dental Lace

Refillable Silk Dental Floss

Silk floss with compostable refillable packaging

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern; silk floss with credible PFAS-free positioning and third-party certification.

MADE SAFE certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Plant Based/Vegan Floss Refillable Glass Container PFAS-Free (2 Spools/4-

Dental Lace

Plant Based/Vegan Floss Refillable Glass Container PFAS-Free (2 Spools/4-

Plant-based vegan floss (likely plant cellulose or silk fibers)

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern product with explicit PFAS-free claim; no third-party verification limits certainty.

Risky category by default

More dental floss grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.