PFAS score
Hawkins · Pressure Cookers
Hawkins 3 Litre Ceramic Nonstick Pressure Cooker, Induction Inner Lid Cooker, Blue (ICC30), 2 Litres
Ceramic nonstick is lower concern than Teflon-type coating, but coating specifics are undisclosed, proceed with caution.
Hawkins markets this as a ceramic nonstick cooker but does not disclose the nonstick coating chemistry or PFAS status. Ceramic itself is a safer base material, but many 'ceramic nonstick' coatings still contain Teflon-family coating or other additives not detailed here.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Ceramic nonstick coating (type unspecified)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed
Marketed non-stick without stating the coating chemistry.
Category baseline
cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 62% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Pressure Cookers
Zavor
LUX Edge 6-Qt. Multicooker Cookbook
Paper/cardboard cookbook; not cookware
Not applicable, this is a cookbook, not cookware hardware.
⚠Risky category by default
Presto
23 Quart Induction Pressure Canner
Stainless steel and aluminum construction
Lower PFAS concern, stainless/aluminum pressure canner with no nonstick coating.
⚠Risky category by default
All American
Aluminum Pressure Cooker IMUSA
aluminum with stainless steel interior
Lower PFAS concern, non-coated aluminum/stainless cooker, but brand makes no PFAS statement.
⚠Risky category by default
More pressure cookers grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.