85/ 100
B
OverallC77/100
Fotodiox GoTough Silicone Mount for GoPro Hero & Hero5 Session Camera

GoPro · Waterproof Camera & Lens Protection

Fotodiox GoTough Silicone Mount for GoPro Hero & Hero5 Session Camera

B · Low PFAS

Lower concern. Silicone mounts rarely contain PFAS, no evidence of risk.

Verdict: BuySilicone mount poses minimal chemical hazard; no documented safety issues with product or brand.

This is a silicone camera mount accessory, not a treated textile or coated cookware. Silicone is an elastomer without known PFAS use. Fotodiox makes no PFAS claims, but silicone materials carry low inherent risk.

Shop GoPro on Amazon →

Material

Silicone mount (elastomer)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This is a silicone elastomer mount, a synthetic rubber polymer chosen for flexibility, grip, and durability in outdoor camera accessories. Silicone is inherently stable at typical use temperatures (well below 200°C) and does not leach plasticizers or volatile organic compounds the way cheaper plastics do. The material has no known toxic degradation pathway under normal handling, mounting, and light exposure. GoPro camera mounts see minimal thermal stress compared to cookware or automotive parts.

The brand's record and disclosure

GoPro does not publish detailed material disclosures or third-party certifications for accessory components like this mount. The brand has no documented recalls or safety controversies specific to silicone mount products. GoPro's silence on material sourcing and supplier audits is typical for the camera accessory industry but reflects a gap in transparency rather than evidence of harm.

How it compares in its category

Silicone mounts are the premium choice in the rigid-mount category; alternatives include injection-molded polycarbonate or ABS plastic, which carry higher risk of BPA or phthalate leaching if lower-quality resins are used. Silicone also outperforms plastic in longevity and UV resistance. This product sits at the safer end of the spectrum for camera mounting accessories.

If you buy it

Store out of direct sunlight to extend elastomer life, though UV degradation is slow with quality silicone. Inspect the mount every 12 months for cracks or hardening; replace if the grip weakens significantly or physical damage appears. Avoid extreme heat (above 60°C in direct sun) for extended periods, though this is unlikely in typical use. No special cleaning beyond mild soap and water is needed.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

None known

Silicone degradation and leaching

No evidence that food-grade or industrial silicone mounts release volatile compounds or toxic breakdown products under normal camera mounting use. Silicone is chemically inert at consumer-use temperatures.

None known

Phthalates in lesser-quality plasticizer alternatives

True silicone does not require phthalate plasticizers. Risk only present if product were mislabeled or contained fillers; no evidence of this for GoPro-branded mounts.

Possible

Heavy metal contaminants in colorants or fillers

Black silicone may contain carbon black pigment, which is safe; colored silicone could theoretically use cheaper pigments with heavy metals. GoPro does not disclose pigment sourcing. Risk remains theoretical and undocumented for this product line.

Possible

Mold and bacterial growth on grip surface

Silicone's porous surface can trap moisture and harbor microbes if stored damp. This is a hygiene issue rather than a chemical hazard; regular drying mitigates risk.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 78% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More waterproof camera & lens protection grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.