Glad · Food Storage Containers
Glad 64 Oz. Clear Rectangle Deep Dish Container 3-Pack
Lower-concern food storage; Glad does not disclose PFAS, but PP containers rarely require fluorine-based treatments.
Glad's polypropylene deep-dish food containers are a conventional plastic choice with no known Teflon-family coating or PFAS-intensive treatment. Glad makes no PFAS claims either way, neither reassuring nor alarming.
Shop Glad on Amazon →Material
Polypropylene (PP) plastic
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
This container is polypropylene (PP), a thermoplastic polymer chosen for food storage because it is rigid, affordable, and considered food-safe by FDA standards. PP does not require fluorine-based non-stick or water-repellent treatments, making PFAS exposure unlikely from the container itself. The material is microwave-safe to moderate temperatures (typically up to 160-180°F) and does not leach BPA or phthalates, which are hazards more common in softer plastics like PVC or polycarbonate.
The brand's record and disclosure
Glad is a major consumer brand (owned by The Clorox Company) with no published PFAS reduction commitments or third-party certifications for this product line. The company does not disclose PFAS content on packaging or marketing materials. No recalls or safety controversies specific to Glad food storage containers are publicly documented. The brand generally meets FDA food-contact plastic regulations but provides minimal transparency beyond baseline compliance.
How it compares in its category
Polypropylene containers like this are the industry standard for affordable, durable food storage and carry no greater safety burden than competing brands (Rubbermaid, Snapware, store brands). PP's lower chemical leaching profile makes it preferable to polycarbonate alternatives. Glass and stainless steel alternatives eliminate plastic-based risks entirely but cost more and are less shatter-resistant. This product sits in the mainstream, low-hazard tier of the category.
If you buy it
Do not microwave these containers above 160°F or use with hot foods above that threshold; sustained heat accelerates any potential degradation. Hand-wash rather than dishwasher to extend coating integrity and reduce thermal stress. Replace if you notice clouding, cracks, or persistent odor absorption after 3-5 years of use. Store away from direct sunlight and strong odors, which can cause surface degradation and off-gassing over time.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
BPA/BPS leaching
Polypropylene does not contain BPA or BPS in its formulation. No established risk for this material class in food storage applications.
Phthalate migration
PP is a rigid plastic not formulated with phthalates. Soft plastics (PVC, PET) pose this risk; this product does not.
Microplastics from degradation when heated
Prolonged exposure to high heat (above 160°F) or repeated thermal cycling can degrade the plastic structure over years, potentially shedding microparticles. Risk is low under intended use (room temperature or moderate microwave heating) but increases with misuse.
Coating or colorant leaching
No published data on heavy metal pigments, dyes, or contaminants in Glad clear containers. Clear polypropylene typically uses minimal additives; no safety alerts are on record for this product.
Odor and chemical off-gassing (non-PFAS volatile organics)
New plastic containers may emit slight petrochemical odor or volatile residues from manufacturing. This is not a toxicological hazard at typical consumer exposure levels but can affect food flavor and indicates container immaturity; pre-rinsing or airing containers before first use reduces perception.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Food Storage Containers
Caraway
Food Storage Set
Glass containers with plastic lids
Lower concern; glass + plastic lids with stated PFAS-free position, but no third-party verification of lid material.
⚠Risky category by default
Caraway
Home 9-Piece Mini Food Storage Set
Borosilicate glass containers with plastic lids
Lower-concern option; glass containers avoid PFAS coatings, but verify lid material before purchase.
⚠Risky category by default
Caraway
Cream 6.6-Cup Non-Stick Glass Food Storage Container with Lid
borosilicate glass with non-PFAS lid
Lower PFAS concern, glass container with stated non-PFAS lid, though third-party verification absent.
⚠Risky category by default
More food storage containers grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.