Fenty Beauty · Concealer
We're Even Hydrating Longwear Concealer — 240N
Lower PFAS risk, but Fenty offers no disclosure, request safety data if concerned.
Fenty Beauty's concealer contains no known Teflon-family coating coatings or water-repellent treatments typical of PFAS-risk products. However, the brand makes no public statement on PFAS policy or testing.
Shop Fenty Beauty on Amazon →Material
liquid concealer (pigments, binders, silicones, water)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
We're Even is a silicone-based liquid concealer containing pigments, water, silicone polymers (likely dimethicone or similar), and synthetic binders. Silicone bases are chemically inert once cured and do not migrate into skin meaningfully. The pigments used in modern concealers are typically approved colorants (iron oxides, titanium dioxide, mica) with established safety profiles at cosmetic concentrations. No volatile organic compounds or formaldehyde releasers are standard in this product type.
The brand's record and disclosure
Fenty Beauty (LVMH subsidiary) does not publicly disclose full PFAS content or testing data for this concealer, despite parent-company pressure on other beauty lines to do so. The brand has no major recalls or established safety controversies on record for this product line. Third-party testing for heavy metals or banned colorants has not been published in accessible form. Fenty does not list talc contamination as a concern for their liquid formulas (talc risk is primarily in powder-form products).
How it compares in its category
Liquid concealers as a category carry lower risk than powders because they lack airborne particulate hazards and tend to use more stable, regulated pigment systems. Fenty's silicone-forward formula is mainstream; comparable brands (MAC Face & Body, NARS Radiant Creamy, Bobbi Brown) use similar base chemistry. No established safety advantage or disadvantage exists between this product and mid-tier alternatives. Fenty's price point does not correlate with disclosed safety testing transparency.
If you buy it
Apply sparingly to avoid product buildup around the eye area, where skin is thinner. Shake bottle before use if separation occurs (normal for silicone formulas). Replace every 12-18 months or if smell or texture changes; liquid cosmetics can support bacterial growth if contaminated. Patch test on inner arm first if you have sensitive or reactive skin, as fragrance or preservatives may irritate some users. Do not heat or store above 25°C (77°F), as silicone polymers can degrade faster in warm conditions.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Heavy metals in colorants (lead, cadmium, mercury)
Iron oxide and titanium dioxide pigments in approved cosmetics are unlikely to contain these; no recalls or testing reports specific to Fenty We're Even on this front.
Fragrance allergens (including undisclosed fragrance components)
Product listing does not specify fragrance concentration or ingredient identity; 'fragrance' on label is permitted to hide proprietary scent compounds. Individuals with fragrance sensitivity may experience contact dermatitis; patch testing recommended.
1,4-dioxane (impurity from synthetic emulsifiers)
Silicone-based formulas have lower 1,4-dioxane risk than surfactant-heavy creams; no published testing data for this specific product.
Formaldehyde or formaldehyde-releasing preservatives
Liquid concealers typically use phenoxyethanol, methylchloroisothiazolinone, or similar non-formaldehyde releasers; no evidence this product uses the older, riskier classes.
Bacterial or mold growth from poor preservation
Liquid products with water content require effective preservative systems; improper storage or contaminated applicators can degrade formula integrity over time. User hygiene (clean applicator, sealed cap) is critical.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
More concealer grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.