NARS · Concealer
NARS Mini Radiant Creamy Concealer
Lower concern than waterproof cosmetics, but NARS discloses nothing, typical for concealers.
NARS Mini Radiant Creamy Concealer contains no known high-risk PFAS ingredients based on its typical cream-based formula (silicones, oils, waxes). The brand makes no PFAS claims or disclosures. Concealer poses lower PFAS risk than waterproof mascara or foundation with water-repellent coating coatings, though third-party testing is absent.
Shop NARS on Amazon →Material
emollient cream base (likely silicone and wax)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
NARS Mini Radiant Creamy Concealer is a silicone-and-wax emulsion designed for blendability and longevity on skin. Silicones are chemically inert on skin and do not leach into the bloodstream; the concern pool is much smaller than for powders or long-wear waterproof formulas that may rely on film-forming polymers or undisclosed binders. The creamy base means minimal risk of particulate inhalation, unlike powder concealers.
The brand's record and disclosure
NARS is owned by Shiseido (Japan) and does not publish a dedicated PFAS transparency statement or ingredient screening policy. The brand follows EU and FDA cosmetic ingredient rules but does not go beyond regulatory minimums for heavy metals or synthetic contaminants. No product-specific recalls or formulation changes have been publicly documented for this concealer line.
How it compares in its category
Cream concealers carry lower inherent hazard than waterproof or long-wear variants, which often use synthetic polymers and undisclosed PFAS-adjacent chemicals. NARS is positioned as a prestige cosmetic with quality control comparable to peers (MAC, Bobbi Brown); hazard profile sits in the middle of the category, better than budget drugstore formulas with thicker preservative loads, no worse than comparable luxury brands.
If you buy it
Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat; silicone-wax bases soften above 25°C. Do not apply near the eye if you have known fragrance or preservative sensitivities (the formula is lightly scented). Discard and replace if the formula separates, smells rancid, or shows visible mold after 12 months of use. Wash your hands before application to avoid introducing bacteria into the pot.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Fragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components
NARS Mini Radiant lists 'fragrance' without specifying composition. Cream concealers in this price tier typically contain synthetic musks and limonene; individual sensitivity is common, particularly around the orbital area.
Preservative irritation (phenoxyethanol, methylisothiazolinone, or parabens)
No NARS ingredient label is publicly available for this specific mini size. Standard cream concealers require broad-spectrum preservatives; sensitivity is rare but documented in 1-3% of users, manifesting as contact dermatitis.
Heavy metals in iron oxides and colorants (lead, cadmium, chromium)
NARS sources colorants through established cosmetic suppliers subject to FDA limits. No product testing or recalls for heavy metal contamination in this line have been reported. Risk is consistent with industry baseline for prestige concealers.
Silicone bioaccumulation on skin over extended use
Cyclomethicone and dimethicone (common in silicone concealers) are volatile or rinse-off; no clinical evidence of dermal bioaccumulation from cosmetic-grade silicones at typical application volumes. Skin barrier function remains intact.
Bacterial or mold growth in cream container
Pot-based packaging increases contamination risk versus airless tubes. Damp applicators or fingers introduced into the formula can seed growth over months; proper hygiene and timely replacement minimize this low-probability event.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
More concealer grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.