85/ 100
B
OverallB81/100
New Dunlop Double Titanium 12 Pack - Golf Balls

Dunlop · Sports Equipment Coatings

New Dunlop Double Titanium 12 Pack - Golf Balls

B · Low PFAS

Lower concern; standard golf balls lack known PFAS applications.

Verdict: BuyStandard golf ball with no established safety hazards; synthetic polymer and elastomer construction poses no known consumer risk during normal play.

Golf balls use synthetic polymers and elastomer covers not typically treated with PFAS. No brand disclosure available, but the product category carries minimal PFAS risk compared to coated apparel or waterproofed goods.

Shop Dunlop on Amazon →

Material

Synthetic polymer core, elastomer cover (standard golf ball)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Dunlop Double Titanium balls use a synthetic polymer core (typically ionomer or polyurethane-based) wrapped in an elastomer cover layer. This construction is industry standard and chosen for durability and performance, not safety concern. Unlike cookware or food-contact items, golf balls do not leach chemicals into ingestion pathways during normal use. The materials are designed to withstand compression and friction without breaking down or releasing volatile compounds.

The brand's record and disclosure

Dunlop (owned by Sumitomo Rubber Industries) does not publicly disclose detailed material safety data sheets for consumer golf balls, which is typical for the sports equipment category and not unusual. No recalls or established safety controversies involving this product line are on record. The brand has not made specific PFAS transparency statements, though standard golf balls lack known PFAS applications in their formulation.

How it compares in its category

Golf balls across major brands (Titleist, Callaway, TaylorMade, Dunlop) use similar synthetic polymer and elastomer constructions; material hazard profiles are essentially equivalent. This category does not carry the safety scrutiny applied to cookware, textiles, or cosmetics because contact is indirect and infrequent. Double Titanium is a mid-range performance line; safety does not meaningfully differ from premium or budget alternatives.

If you buy it

Golf balls require no special handling or maintenance for safety purposes. Store them in cool, dry conditions to preserve cover integrity and flight characteristics, though degradation is performance-related, not health-related. Replace balls if covers become cracked, cut, or waterlogged, which affects playability rather than safety. There are no temperature, humidity, or use limits tied to chemical leaching or off-gassing.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

None known

Polymer degradation and microparticle shedding

While elastomer covers do wear with use, no established evidence shows that golf ball shedding produces inhalable microparticles or ingestion risk during normal play. Degradation is primarily cosmetic and performance-related.

None known

Heavy metal pigments in cover coating

Dunlop balls are typically white or colored with standard industrial pigments; no recalls or reports of lead, cadmium, or antimony contamination in this product line are on record.

None known

Volatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing

Golf balls do not undergo heating during storage or use in ways that would trigger off-gassing. No odor complaints or VOC warnings have been established for this product.

Possible

Bacterial or mold growth if wet-stored

If balls are stored in damp conditions for extended periods, surface mold or bacterial colonization can occur, though this is a hygiene concern rather than a chemical hazard and is easily prevented by air-drying and dry storage.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More sports equipment coatings grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.