85/ 100
B
OverallC77/100
Dunlop Ddh I.c.e. Golf Balls

Dunlop · Sports Equipment Coatings

Dunlop Ddh I.c.e. Golf Balls

B · Low PFAS

Golf balls carry minimal PFAS risk; no concerning coatings known.

Verdict: BuyGolf balls pose minimal chemical hazard; synthetic rubber and resin construction carries no established safety concerns for recreational use.

Dunlop DDH I.C.E. golf balls use standard elastomer cover materials without known PFAS-specific surface treatments. No brand disclosure on PFAS, but this product category poses lower concern than apparel or cookware.

Shop Dunlop on Amazon →

Material

Synthetic rubber and resin core, elastomer cover

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Dunlop DDH I.C.E. balls use a synthetic rubber and resin core with an elastomer cover, a standard construction for performance golf balls. This material combination is designed for durability and consistent flight rather than chemical release. Unlike cookware or food-contact items, golf balls do not leach into consumables and are handled briefly during outdoor play, minimizing any exposure pathway to skin or inhalation.

The brand's record and disclosure

Dunlop, owned by Sumitomo Rubber, does not publicly disclose detailed chemical composition or third-party safety certifications for golf balls, which is typical across the category. No recalls or public health warnings are on record for DDH I.C.E. or similar Dunlop ball lines. The brand's silence on PFAS reflects broader industry practice; golf ball manufacturers have not faced regulatory pressure on this front.

How it compares in its category

Golf balls are among the least chemically regulated consumer products. Dunlop DDH I.C.E. sits in the mainstream performance tier, using conventional elastomer and resin chemistry shared by Titleist, Callaway, and TaylorMade models. No credible evidence distinguishes this product as higher or lower risk than competitors; all golf balls present similar minimal chemical hazard for normal use.

If you buy it

Store golf balls at room temperature away from prolonged direct sunlight, which can degrade elastomer over years of storage. There are no heat limits or maintenance requirements for normal play. Replace balls when covers crack, peel, or lose dimple definition, as structural failure affects performance more than chemical safety. Wash hands after play if desired, though residue transfer is negligible.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Elastomer and resin degradation

Extended UV exposure and temperature cycling may cause surface cracking or minor material breakdown over years of storage or use, but no evidence of toxic chemical release from standard Dunlop ball materials under normal conditions.

None known

Heavy metals in pigments (cover dyes)

No public data on colorant chemistry in DDH I.C.E. covers. Golf ball pigments are not ingested or inhaled in meaningful quantities during play, limiting exposure risk even if legacy dyes were present.

None known

Volatile organic compounds (VOC) off-gassing

Synthetic rubber and resin cores may emit minor VOCs during manufacturing or initial storage, but no emissions are recorded or expected to be significant during consumer use in open outdoor environments.

Possible

Microplastic shedding

Ball covers may shed microscopic elastomer particles during play and washing, particularly as they age. These particles enter soil and water but pose no direct human health risk during the golfer's handling.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More sports equipment coatings grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.