40/ 100
F
OverallF24/100
Waterproof Duffel Bag

Dry Bag Co. · Waterproof Gear Storage Bags

Waterproof Duffel Bag

F · High PFAS

Skip until brand discloses coating chemistry or certifications.

Verdict: SkipUncoated fabric waterproofing chemistry unknown; PFAS risk unconfirmed but plausible. Buy only if brand discloses, or accept uncertainty and limit contact with skin/food.

Waterproof duffel bags typically use water-repellent coating coatings that may contain PFAS, but Dry Bag Co. provides no material or chemical transparency. Without disclosure or third-party verification, risk level is unclear.

The safe swap

Pelican 1595 Air Travel Case

Pelican

Pelican 1595 Air Travel Case

85/100 safety

B

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned its B.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Fabric with unspecified waterproof coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Dry Bag Co. duffel uses fabric with an unspecified waterproof coating. Most waterproof fabrics rely on either polyurethane (PU), silicone, wax, or fluorocarbon treatments. Fluorocarbon coatings are effective water repellents but often contain legacy PFAS or PFAS replacements that leach slowly into contact materials and sweat. Without disclosure from the brand, the actual chemistry remains opaque, making full risk assessment impossible.

The brand's record and disclosure

Dry Bag Co. has not publicly disclosed the waterproof coating chemistry, certifications (such as bluesign, Cradle to Cradle, or OEKO-TEX), or any commitment to PFAS-free alternatives. No recall history or contamination incidents are publicly documented for this brand. The silence on coating composition is a significant red flag in an industry where responsible manufacturers increasingly specify non-fluorinated options or third-party test results.

How it compares in its category

Most commercial waterproof duffels use fluorocarbon or polyurethane coatings; some premium brands (e.g., Patagonia) have begun phasing to PU-only or wax-coated natural fabrics with full disclosure. Dry Bag Co. sits in the middle of the market without transparency, making it harder to compare to either budget (often untested) or eco-certified peers. Price and warranty information would help contextualize the risk-benefit, but are not provided here.

If you buy it

Avoid prolonged skin contact, especially if damp or warm (promotes leaching). Do not store food or cosmetics inside without a sealed inner container. Wipe exterior with a damp cloth rather than machine washing, which may degrade the coating and release particles. Before purchase, contact the brand directly and request the Safety Data Sheet (SDS) for the waterproofing agent; silence after 2 weeks is a valid reason to choose a competitor.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

PFAS and fluorinated coating leaching

Unspecified waterproof coating likely contains fluorocarbons or PFAS-based compounds; direct skin contact and sweat exposure over time may result in slow dermal absorption. Risk tier reflects lack of brand disclosure rather than confirmed contamination.

Possible

Coating degradation and microplastic shedding

Repeated washing, UV exposure, or mechanical wear of waterproof coatings can shed microscopic polymer fragments into sweat, water, or contact surfaces. Dry Bag Co. does not specify coating durability or replacement guidance.

Possible

Volatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing

Waterproof polyurethane or solvent-applied coatings may emit low levels of solvents or catalysts during manufacturing and early use, particularly in warm or enclosed spaces. Off-gassing typically diminishes within days to weeks but is not quantified for this product.

None known

Fabric treatment chemical residues

Base fabric may carry formaldehyde resins or azo dyes if not specified as natural fiber or organically grown. No documentation available for Dry Bag Co. duffels; assume standard textile processing unless certified otherwise.

Possible

Mold and bacterial growth from moisture retention

Waterproof coatings can trap moisture inside the bag if ventilation is poor, creating conditions for mold or odor-causing bacteria. Proper drying and periodic airing are essential to mitigate this non-chemical hazard.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Gear Storage Bags

Pelican 1595 Air Travel Case

Pelican

1595 Air Travel Case

Polypropylene shell, polyurethane foam, stainless steel hardware

B
B
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS1 flag

Lower concern. Polypropylene case with no water-repellent treatment evident.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More waterproof gear storage bags grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.