40/ 100
F
OverallF22/100
Exped Drybag Versa Telecompression

Dry Bag Co. · Waterproof Gear Storage Bags

Exped Drybag Versa Telecompression

F · High PFAS

Skip. Waterproof coating composition undisclosed, PFAS risk unclear.

Verdict: SkipPolyester/nylon drybag with undisclosed waterproof coating; PFAS risk unresolved but manageable if used as intended. Non-PFAS hazards minimal if not heated.

Exped drybags use polyester/nylon with waterproof treatment, but coating chemistry is not publicly disclosed. No PFAS claims or third-party verification available to assess risk.

The safe swap

Pelican 1595 Air Travel Case

Pelican

Pelican 1595 Air Travel Case

85/100 safety

B

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned its B.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyester/nylon drybag with waterproof coating, unknown water-repellent coating treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This drybag combines polyester and nylon fabrics with an applied waterproof coating of unknown composition. The coating is the critical unknown: traditional water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatments on outdoor gear historically relied on PFAS, though some manufacturers have shifted to fluorine-free alternatives. Without disclosure from Dry Bag Co., the coating chemistry cannot be verified. Polyester and nylon themselves are not acutely hazardous in this application; the risk centers on what binds the waterproofing.

The brand's record and disclosure

Dry Bag Co. has not publicly disclosed coating materials, manufacturing certifications, or PFAS policy, which is a significant transparency gap for a product sold for water contact. No recalls or safety incidents are on record for this specific model. The brand's silence on water-repellent coating chemistry is typical of smaller outdoor gear manufacturers, but it prevents independent assessment of PFAS exposure risk. This lack of transparency is the primary reason to approach with caution rather than confidence.

How it compares in its category

Drybags occupy a middle ground: less regulated than food-contact items but more consumer-facing than industrial textiles. Major competitors (e.g., Sea to Summit, Outdoor Research) increasingly publish PFAS-free claims or disclose fluorine-free water-repellent coating use, setting a higher transparency standard. Exped (the likely actual brand, if this is a rebranded product) has made some moves toward PFAS reduction, but generic 'Dry Bag Co.' labeling suggests either a private label or smaller manufacturer without equivalent commitment. The category trend is toward disclosed coatings; this product's silence puts it behind.

If you buy it

Use it as intended: compression bag for dry storage, not for prolonged food contact or heating. Do not tumble-dry, iron, or expose to high heat, which could degrade the coating and release volatile compounds. Rinse occasionally with cool water to remove salt or debris; air-dry away from direct sun. If the coating begins to flake, peel, or lose water repellency within 1-2 years of normal use, replacement is prudent rather than attempting repair with unknown adhesives.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Coating degradation and leachates

Polyurethane or other synthetic waterproof coatings may shed microparticles or volatile organic compounds (VOCs) when flexed, compressed, or exposed to sun. Specific risk depends on coating formulation, which is undisclosed. Normal dry-bag use (dry storage, periodic rinsing) carries minimal acute risk, but degraded coatings could release unknown substances.

None known

Azo dyes in polyester/nylon

Polyester and nylon drybags typically use standard disperse or reactive dyes. No specific azo dye safety issues or recalls are recorded for Dry Bag Co. or generic drybags in this category. Risk is low if the fabric was produced to standard textile safety specifications.

None known

Formaldehyde resins

Formaldehyde-based resins are not commonly used in drybag construction. No historical reports link drybags to formaldehyde off-gassing. This hazard is not a primary concern for this product category.

Possible

Heat exposure and coating integrity

If stored near heat sources or left in a vehicle, the waterproof coating may soften, degrade, or release volatiles. Drybags should not be subjected to temperatures above 60-70C (140-158F). Extended heat exposure risks compromising water repellency and potentially eluting coating components.

Reported

water-repellent coating chemical exposure (PFAS or alternative)

Waterproof coatings universally contain either PFAS or fluorine-free alternatives, both of which require chemical treatment. This bag's coating composition is undisclosed. Contact with the coating itself during normal use is minimal, but washing or storage in sealed containers could theoretically increase volatile or particulate exposure if coating is degrading.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Gear Storage Bags

Pelican 1595 Air Travel Case

Pelican

1595 Air Travel Case

Polypropylene shell, polyurethane foam, stainless steel hardware

B
B
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS1 flag

Lower concern. Polypropylene case with no water-repellent treatment evident.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More waterproof gear storage bags grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.