65/ 100
D
OverallF43/100
Dickies Men's Pro Series Work Shirt

Dickies · Stain-Resistant Professional Workwear

Dickies Men's Pro Series Work Shirt

D · Elevated

Lower concern; standard work shirt without waterproofing or stain treatment.

Verdict: SkipCotton-polyester blend work shirt with no known hazardous coatings; standard construction poses minimal chemical risk with proper care.

Dickies Pro Series Work Shirt appears to be untreated cotton-polyester blend with no water-resistant or stain-resistant finishes disclosed. No PFAS claim or concern signals identified, but brand provides no explicit PFAS transparency.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

cotton-polyester blend, no disclosed coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Dickies Pro Series Work Shirt is a cotton-polyester blend, typically around 65/35 or similar ratio. Cotton is inherently low-risk; polyester contributes durability and wrinkle resistance without requiring added chemical treatments. No waterproofing, stain resistance, or antimicrobial coatings are disclosed, which eliminates common sources of fluorinated compounds or antimony in synthetic fibers. The blend construction itself does not require formaldehyde-based finishing resins typical of 100% cotton dress shirts.

The brand's record and disclosure

Dickies (owned by Kontoor Brands) does not publicly disclose detailed chemical composition, PFAS use, or third-party certifications like OEKO-TEX for this work-shirt line. The brand has not faced major recalls or public controversies tied to chemical hazards in basic work apparel. Transparency on restricted substances is limited compared to premium or eco-focused competitors, but the absence of specialty coatings reduces concern for undisclosed chemicals in this product specifically.

How it compares in its category

Standard work shirts in this price tier rarely carry chemical treatments beyond basic dyeing and finishing. Dickies Pro Series sits in the mainstream durability-focused segment; it avoids heavy-duty waterproofing or FR (flame-retardant) coatings found in industrial or firefighter gear, which would introduce additional hazards. Compared to budget alternatives, Dickies' manufacturing scale and retail presence suggest consistent quality control, though this does not guarantee chemical transparency.

If you buy it

Wash new shirts before first wear to reduce residual dyes and finishing agents. Use warm water, standard detergent, and avoid excessive heat (dryer on medium or air dry preferred) to minimize polyester fiber degradation over time. Inspect seams and stitching annually for wear; replace if underarm or collar seams fray or fabric pills excessively, as this signals fiber breakdown rather than a safety trigger. Do not use chlorine bleach, which can degrade polyester and release chlorinated byproducts.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

None known

Formaldehyde resins in finishing

Cotton-polyester blends for casual/work wear typically avoid heavy formaldehyde-based durable-press finishes because polyester already provides wrinkle resistance. No formaldehyde resin treatment is disclosed for this product; standard dyeing and mercerization do not require it.

Possible

Azo dyes and colorant toxicity

Like all dyed textiles, the Dickies Pro Series may contain azo dyes that release aromatic amines if hydrolyzed or when exposed to sweat. Dickies does not publicly certify compliance with restricted azo standards (e.g., OEKO-TEX Standard 100). Risk is low for skin contact during normal wear but present for chronic exposure or if garment is heavily abraded.

Possible

Antimony in polyester

Polyester fiber production sometimes uses antimony trioxide as a catalyst. Antimony migration into sweat is minimal in intact fabric but increases if the garment frays, pils excessively, or is heated repeatedly. Dickies does not publish antimony content data; it remains a category-level concern for polyester-blend work shirts, though toxicity is low in occupational contexts.

Reported

Residual dyes and mordants on unwashed fabric

New work shirts often retain unfixed dyes and processing chemicals (salt, soda ash, oils) that can irritate sensitive skin or cause temporary color bleeding. First washing significantly reduces this exposure. Dickies Pro Series has no known recalls for dye issues, but pre-wash is standard practice for any new dyed textile.

Possible

Microplastic shedding during washing

Polyester component sheds microfibers during laundering, particularly in early washes and with abrasive detergents or high agitation. This is an environmental concern rather than a direct health hazard to the wearer, but accumulation in wastewater is documented. Use a microfiber-catching wash bag or lower-agitation cycles to minimize shedding.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More stain-resistant professional workwear grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.