65/ 100
D
OverallF53/100
Dockers Men's Ultimate Lindley Poplin Shirt

Dockers · Stain-Resistant Professional Workwear

Dockers Men's Ultimate Lindley Poplin Shirt

D · Elevated

Lower concern. Poplin shirt lacks water/stain treatment triggers.

Verdict: SkipCotton-blend poplin shirt with no established hazard concerns; standard casual wear with routine care.

Dockers does not disclose PFAS use for this poplin shirt. Standard cotton blend without stated water-repellent coating or stain treatments suggests lower PFAS risk, though no verification exists.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

cotton poplin blend

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This shirt is cotton poplin (a plain-weave cotton fabric, typically blended with polyester for durability and wrinkle resistance). Poplin construction itself poses no inherent chemical risk; the hazard profile depends entirely on dyeing, finishing resins, and any durable-press or soil-resistant treatments applied. Standard poplin shirts like this one are finished with minimal chemical burden compared to performance or water-resistant apparel, making the material class low-risk for consumer exposure.

The brand's record and disclosure

Dockers (owned by Levi Strauss) does not publicly disclose detailed chemical-management policies or third-party certifications (such as bluesign or GOTS) for most basic apparel lines. The brand has not faced major public recalls or documented chemical contamination incidents for casual shirts. Transparency on formaldehyde resins, azo dyes, or heavy metals in dyes is absent from available marketing materials, which is typical for mainstream casual wear but limits consumer verification.

How it compares in its category

Men's casual poplin shirts are among the lowest-hazard category within apparel; they undergo standard industrial dyeing and finish but typically skip water-repellent or flame-retardant treatments that introduce additional chemical loads. Dockers positioned this as basic workwear, so it avoids premium finishes (antimicrobial, stain-guard) that would elevate chemical exposure risk. Compared to synthetic performance wear or chemically treated utility fabrics, poplin is straightforward.

If you buy it

Wash in cool water before first wear to remove residual dyes and finishes. Use standard laundry detergent; no special care needed. Avoid high heat (tumble dry low or hang dry); high heat can degrade elastic fibers if blended in cuffs or collar, though it poses no direct chemical hazard. Replace when seams fail or fabric pilling becomes excessive, typically after 2-3 years of regular wear.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Formaldehyde resins (wrinkle/shrink finishes)

Cotton-polyester poplin may receive formaldehyde-based durable-press finish to reduce wrinkling. Dockers does not disclose finish chemistry; low-level residual formaldehyde can off-gas during storage and early wear. Washing before wear significantly reduces exposure.

Possible

Azo dyes and azo-dye metabolites

Standard industrial cotton dyeing often employs azo dyes, which are regulated but not banned in most markets. Risk is primarily occupational (dye-house workers); consumer exposure through finished garments is low unless dyes are unstable or run heavily in wash. This product has no known quality issues reported.

None known

Heavy metals in textile dyes

Lead and cadmium in dyes are banned in most OECD countries. Dockers sources primarily from regulated facilities; no recalls or contamination reports exist for this product line. Risk is theoretical unless brand sources from unregulated suppliers, which is undocumented.

None known

Antimony in polyester fiber

Antimony oxide is used as a catalyst in polyester synthesis and can be present in trace amounts in fabric. Studies show skin contact exposure from finished garments is negligible; antimony is poorly absorbed through intact skin. No health incidents tied to casual poplin wear exist in literature.

Possible

Allergenic dyes and finishes

Individuals with textile dye sensitivity or formaldehyde contact dermatitis may react to residual chemicals in new unwashed garments. Washing eliminates most risk. Pre-sensitized consumers should test on a small area or opt for certified-organic or undyed alternatives.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More stain-resistant professional workwear grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.