75/ 100
C
OverallD67/100
Dental Lace Silk Floss

Dental Lace · Dental Floss

Dental Lace Silk Floss

C · Moderate

Lower PFAS concern; silk floss has no typical functional reason for PFAS coatings.

Verdict: BuySilk floss with minimal chemical hazard profile; no dyes or coatings typical of contamination risks; brand transparency limited but material class inherently low-risk.

Dental Lace makes floss from silk, a natural protein fiber with no inherent need for Teflon-family coating coatings or water-repellent finishes. The brand does not publicly disclose PFAS use or claim PFAS-free status.

Shop Dental Lace on Amazon →

Material

Silk floss (undyed or naturally dyed)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Dental Lace floss is made from silk fibers, a protein polymer derived from silkworm cocoons. Silk is inherently inert in the mouth and does not rely on synthetic polymers, plasticizers, or binding resins typical of conventional nylon floss. The product uses either undyed silk or natural dyes (commonly plant-based), avoiding synthetic azo dyes and heavy-metal pigments used in some colored flosses. Silk naturally degrades in the oral environment without releasing microplastics or synthetic breakdown products.

The brand's record and disclosure

Dental Lace is a smaller, direct-to-consumer oral care brand emphasizing natural and sustainable materials; publicly available ingredient disclosure and safety certifications are minimal. No major recalls or safety incidents are on record for this product. The brand does not publish detailed testing data or third-party certifications (e.g., NSF, FDA premarket review statements), which is typical for small natural-product companies but limits independent verification. Their PFAS stance is not publicly articulated, though the material class itself presents no typical functional need for such coatings.

How it compares in its category

Silk floss is a premium alternative to conventional nylon floss (polyamide), which can contain microplastics and coatings that may include Teflon-type coating or wax additives of variable safety. Most synthetic flosses are dyed with regulated colorants, but undyed or naturally dyed silk eliminates that exposure pathway entirely. Dental Lace sits at the lower chemical-input end of the floss market; it trades some durability and breakage resistance of nylon for simpler composition and oral-environment biodegradability.

If you buy it

Silk floss is softer and more prone to shredding or breaking than nylon, especially if pulled hard between tight contacts; use gentle, sliding motions rather than snapping. Store in a cool, dry place away from moisture to prevent mildew (silk is protein-based and can degrade in very humid conditions). Replace the spool when fibers begin fraying noticeably or if the dispenser shows visible wear. As with all floss, discard after single use and do not reuse strands.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Natural dye allergenicity or irritation

If Dental Lace uses plant-based dyes (e.g., madder, indigo, or other botanical colorants), trace allergic contact reactions in the oral mucosa are theoretically possible in sensitized individuals, though documented cases for floss are extremely rare. No incidents are on record for this brand.

None known

Silk protein degradation and microbial colonization

Silk is a protein polymer and can theoretically support fungal or bacterial growth if stored wet or in humid conditions for extended periods. No safety incidents have been reported; standard dry storage prevents this risk.

None known

Microplastics and synthetic polymer fragments

Silk floss does not shed microplastics because it is not a synthetic polymer. Degradation products are proteinaceous and are swallowed or expelled without concern for microplastic bioaccumulation.

None known

Heavy-metal contamination in dyes or binding agents

Silk floss formulations do not employ traditional synthetic dye classes (azo, triphenylmethane) or heavy-metal mordants in typical consumer oral-care applications. No test data or recalls implicate metal contamination in Dental Lace products.

Possible

Coating or wax additives (wax-coated variants)

If Dental Lace offers wax-coated versions, the wax source and purity become relevant. Plant-based waxes (e.g., beeswax, candelilla) are generally safe; synthetic or paraffin-based waxes carry minimal risk in short-contact oral use. Product labeling should specify wax type; none on record as problematic.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 78% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Dental Floss

Cocofloss Refill Trio

Cocofloss

Refill Trio

Coconut fiber, based floss with plant-based coating

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern dental product; natural materials and transparent PFAS stance, but no independent verification.

Risky category by default

Refillable Silk Dental Floss

Dental Lace

Refillable Silk Dental Floss

Silk floss with compostable refillable packaging

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern; silk floss with credible PFAS-free positioning and third-party certification.

MADE SAFE certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Plant Based/Vegan Floss Refillable Glass Container PFAS-Free (2 Spools/4-

Dental Lace

Plant Based/Vegan Floss Refillable Glass Container PFAS-Free (2 Spools/4-

Plant-based vegan floss (likely plant cellulose or silk fibers)

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern product with explicit PFAS-free claim; no third-party verification limits certainty.

Risky category by default

More dental floss grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.