75/ 100
C
OverallF63/100
Dental Lace Dental Floss

Dental Lace · Dental Floss

Dental Lace Dental Floss

C · Moderate

Lower concern, natural materials, but brand offers no PFAS transparency.

Verdict: BuyNatural silk floss with plant wax poses minimal chemical hazard; brand transparency is weak but material composition mitigates concern.

Dental Lace floss is marketed as silk-based with plant-derived waxes (typically beeswax or plant oils), which are inherently low-PFAS materials. However, the brand makes no public disclosure about PFAS testing or chemical-free claims. No third-party certifications addressing PFAS are documented.

Shop Dental Lace on Amazon →

Material

Silk floss, plant-based wax coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Dental Lace floss is constructed from silk fibers coated with plant-based wax, typically candelilla or similar natural wax alternatives. Silk is a protein fiber with minimal leaching risk in the oral environment, and plant waxes avoid synthetic polymer coatings (like nylon or polytetrafluoroethylene/Teflon-type coating) that can release microplastics or problematic residues. The material degrades naturally if swallowed in small amounts, unlike conventional plastic flosses.

The brand's record and disclosure

Dental Lace markets itself as an eco-conscious, zero-waste oral care brand and provides transparent information about its use of silk and plant waxes on product packaging and website. The brand does not publicly address PFAS testing or certification, and no independent third-party certifications (such as NSF, Leaping Bunny, or toxicology validation) have been reported for this product. No product recalls or safety incidents are on record for Dental Lace floss.

How it compares in its category

Most conventional dental floss is made from nylon monofilament or multifilament coated with synthetic wax or petroleum-derived compounds; some brands use Teflon-type coating (Teflon), which can shed microplastics with aggressive use. Silk-based flosses like Dental Lace occupy a small niche in the market and generally avoid the microplastic and synthetic chemical exposure of mass-market alternatives. Plant-wax coatings are inherently lower-risk than synthetic polymer or fluorocarbon finishes, though they may offer slightly less slip than traditional wax.

If you buy it

Dental floss is used in small quantities and not ingested, so systemic exposure to any coating residues is minimal. Store the product in a cool, dry place to prevent wax degradation; silk fibers are durable but will naturally fray over time if repeatedly wetted and dried. Replace the spool when fraying increases or waxing visibly diminishes. Standard daily use poses no known heating, mechanical degradation, or contamination risk beyond normal oral hygiene.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

None known

Microplastic shedding

Silk fiber with plant wax does not shed microplastics; no evidence of particle release or degradation into the oral cavity under normal flossing use.

None known

Heavy metals in natural fiber coatings

Plant waxes (candelilla, carnauba) do not accumulate heavy metals; no data suggests lead, cadmium, or other metals in Dental Lace floss formulation.

Possible

Wax coating degradation and leaching

Plant waxes may gradually soften or lose slip with moisture exposure and storage; composition of any additives (dyes, flavorants) in the wax is not publicly disclosed, so minor leaching of undisclosed minor ingredients remains theoretically possible but not documented.

Possible

Allergic reaction to silk or natural additives

Silk allergy is rare but documented in sensitive individuals; any flavorants, essential oils, or dyes in the plant wax coating could trigger contact sensitivity in the gingival tissue, though no incidents are on record for this brand.

Possible

Bacterial growth on natural fibers if stored damp

Silk is proteinaceous and can support microbial growth if the floss spool is stored in a moist bathroom environment; proper air-dry storage mitigates this risk.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Dental Floss

Cocofloss Refill Trio

Cocofloss

Refill Trio

Coconut fiber, based floss with plant-based coating

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern dental product; natural materials and transparent PFAS stance, but no independent verification.

Risky category by default

Refillable Silk Dental Floss

Dental Lace

Refillable Silk Dental Floss

Silk floss with compostable refillable packaging

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern; silk floss with credible PFAS-free positioning and third-party certification.

MADE SAFE certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Plant Based/Vegan Floss Refillable Glass Container PFAS-Free (2 Spools/4-

Dental Lace

Plant Based/Vegan Floss Refillable Glass Container PFAS-Free (2 Spools/4-

Plant-based vegan floss (likely plant cellulose or silk fibers)

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern product with explicit PFAS-free claim; no third-party verification limits certainty.

Risky category by default

More dental floss grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.