75/ 100
C
OverallF59/100
Thai Deodorant Stone

Crystal · Deodorant

Thai Deodorant Stone

C · Moderate

Lower PFAS concern, mineral deodorant stone is a naturally derived product with no known PFAS-risk applications.

Verdict: BuyMineral alum deodorant stone has no established hazards beyond normal use; low PFAS profile and no major brand safety controversies on record.

Crystal's Thai Deodorant Stone is a mineral salt (typically potassium alum or ammonium alum) with no intentional coatings, treatments, or water-resistance claims that would introduce PFAS. The brand discloses no PFAS information, but the product category and material composition pose minimal theoretical risk.

Shop Crystal on Amazon →

Material

mineral (alum-based rock/salt)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Thai deodorant stones are primarily potassium alum, a naturally occurring double sulfate mineral, combined with trace minerals. Potassium alum has been used in personal care for centuries and is recognized by regulatory bodies as safe at use levels in antiperspirants and deodorants. The crystal form used in this product is minimally processed compared to powder or liquid formulations, reducing manufacturing additives. When dissolved on damp skin, it creates a thin mineral layer that inhibits odor-causing bacteria without blocking sweat glands.

The brand's record and disclosure

Crystal is a privately held brand with a long market history (1970s onward) and maintains a simple product lineup focused on mineral deodorant stones. The brand makes no formal third-party certifications (USDA organic, EWG verified, etc.) and is relatively silent on ingredient sourcing and manufacturing practices. No major recalls or safety controversies are on public record for this product line. Transparency on PFAS testing or avoidance is not publicly stated, which is typical for traditional mineral deodorant brands.

How it compares in its category

Mineral deodorant stones occupy a lower-risk position compared to conventional aerosol and roll-on deodorants, which often contain synthetic fragrance compounds, preservatives, and aluminum chlorohydrate or zirconium compounds. They also avoid the solvent and propellant exposure of spray formulations. Compared to other natural/mineral alternatives like baking soda or charcoal deodorants, alum stones are less likely to cause skin irritation in sensitive users, though individual reactions vary. The main trade-off is lower sweat suppression versus traditional antiperspirants.

If you buy it

Use on clean, damp skin by rubbing the stone directly or dissolving it in water to apply as a liquid. Storage in a dry place is important; wet conditions promote bacterial growth on the stone surface. Replace the stone if visible cracks, heavy fragmentation, or discoloration occurs, though they typically last many months. Do not use on broken or freshly shaved skin, as alum may cause stinging; patch-test first if you have sensitive skin or a history of contact dermatitis.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Aluminum absorption via skin

Potassium alum is a source of bioavailable aluminum. Absorption through intact skin is low, but the long-term systemic effects of repeated dermal alum exposure remain incompletely studied in scientific literature. Risk is generally considered minimal for typical use, but remains a consideration for frequent or whole-body application.

Possible

Skin irritation and contact dermatitis

While alum is generally well-tolerated, some users report localized irritation, stinging, or allergic contact dermatitis, particularly on sensitive or freshly shaved skin. Reactions are user-dependent and not tied to product defect; prior patch-testing is recommended.

Possible

Bacterial or mold growth on stone

If stored in damp conditions or shared among users, the porous mineral surface can harbor bacteria or fungal growth. Proper drying and individual-use storage mitigate this risk effectively.

None known

Heavy metal contamination in mineral source

No published recalls or reports of lead, cadmium, or other heavy metal contamination in Crystal brand deodorant stones. As a naturally mined mineral, trace heavy metals are theoretically possible but are not documented as a safety issue for this product.

Possible

Fragrance allergens (if scented variant)

Crystal produces both unscented and scented versions. Scented variants may contain synthetic fragrance oils that can trigger allergic contact dermatitis or sensitization in some users; the unscented stone avoids this entirely.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 80% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower concern, mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower-concern deodorant; mineral-based formula with PFAS-free claim aligns with brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Antiperspirant Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Antiperspirant Deodorant

mineral-based active ingredients, plant-derived botanicals, no synthetic water-repellent coatings

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower PFAS concern, mineral-based formula with MADE SAFE cert; antiperspirant category has minimal waterproof-coating risk.

MADE SAFE CertifiedLeaping Bunny (cruelty-free)

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.