75/ 100
C
OverallC71/100
Crest Shred Guard Floss, Mint

Crest · Dental Floss

Crest Shred Guard Floss, Mint

C · Moderate

Lower PFAS concern for typical nylon dental floss; no known treatment triggers.

Verdict: BuyStandard nylon dental floss with no established safety concerns; typical product in a low-risk category. PFAS profile acceptable for brief oral contact.

Crest Shred Guard Floss is standard nylon dental floss with no reported PFAS coatings or water-resistant treatments typical of high-risk products. The brand does not disclose PFAS information, which is common for this category. No public lab data or recalls flag this product.

Shop Crest on Amazon →

Material

Nylon filament (standard dental floss)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Crest Shred Guard Floss is a nylon monofilament or twisted nylon construction, a standard material for dental floss that has been used safely for decades. The nylon core is coated with wax (typically paraffin or beeswax blend) and mint flavoring to aid slip and palatability. Nylon does not leach monomers or plasticizers during normal oral use because it is a condensation polymer with minimal residual chemicals, and the brief contact time (seconds per day) in the mouth limits any theoretical exposure. The mint flavoring is typically a food-grade essential oil or synthetic flavoring agent at trace levels, well below oral irritation thresholds for the target age group.

The brand's record and disclosure

Crest (Procter and Gamble) does not publicly disclose material sourcing or chemical composition details for dental floss beyond ingredient names on packaging. The brand has no known recalls or safety controversies specific to Shred Guard Floss. Crest products generally comply with FDA oral care device regulations and ingredient standards (Code of Federal Regulations Title 21), though the company rarely publishes third-party safety testing or certification beyond regulatory minimum.

How it compares in its category

Crest Shred Guard Floss is a conventional waxed nylon floss, identical in material class to generic and store-brand dental floss. Its main differentiation is the wax formulation designed to reduce shredding and improve glide, not material safety. Compared to silk floss (biodegradable but similar chemical safety profile) or water flossers (different delivery mechanism), nylon floss carries no known added hazards. Price and performance are the primary consumer choice drivers in this category, not safety differentiation.

If you buy it

Use as directed: one length (18-24 inches) per flossing session, discarded after single use. No storage concerns; keep in a cool, dry place to prevent wax softening. Replace the container or spool if the dispenser becomes contaminated. Floss is not swallowed in normal use, so ingestion hazard is negligible; supervise young children to ensure they do not consume floss. Discontinue use if gum irritation or allergic reaction (rare, typically to mint flavoring) occurs.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Mint flavoring allergens

Mint flavoring (menthol or peppermint oil) can trigger contact irritation or rare allergic reaction in individuals with mint sensitivity or inflamed gums. Reactions are mild and localized to oral tissue; no systemic risk at typical floss flavoring concentrations.

None known

Wax coating degradation or shedding

The paraffin or beeswax coating is designed to remain on the floss during use and is swallowed in negligible amounts. No established toxicity for food-grade wax at these trace exposures; not a safety concern in standard use.

None known

Nylon microfiber ingestion

Nylon floss does not fragment into microfibers during normal flossing. Any theoretical fibers swallowed are non-toxic and eliminated without absorption; no known health impact in the dental floss literature.

None known

Colorant or dye allergens

Mint-flavored floss typically contains food-approved colorants (e.g., FD&C Blue No. 1) at trace levels. No azo dyes or heavy metal pigments are used in dental floss; regulatory approval for oral products is stricter than for textiles or cosmetics.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Dental Floss

Cocofloss Refill Trio

Cocofloss

Refill Trio

Coconut fiber, based floss with plant-based coating

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern dental product; natural materials and transparent PFAS stance, but no independent verification.

Risky category by default

Refillable Silk Dental Floss

Dental Lace

Refillable Silk Dental Floss

Silk floss with compostable refillable packaging

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern; silk floss with credible PFAS-free positioning and third-party certification.

MADE SAFE certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Plant Based/Vegan Floss Refillable Glass Container PFAS-Free (2 Spools/4-

Dental Lace

Plant Based/Vegan Floss Refillable Glass Container PFAS-Free (2 Spools/4-

Plant-based vegan floss (likely plant cellulose or silk fibers)

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern product with explicit PFAS-free claim; no third-party verification limits certainty.

Risky category by default

More dental floss grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.