Columbia · Hiking Shoes & Trail Runners
Columbia Men's Redmond Shoe
water-repellent coating treatment may contain PFAS; Columbia does not disclose.
Columbia's Redmond shoe likely uses water-repellent coating waterproof coating, which commonly contains PFAS. Brand provides no PFAS transparency or certifications to verify alternative chemistry.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Fabric upper with water-repellent coating waterproof treatment
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Columbia Redmond shoes feature a fabric (likely nylon or polyester blend) upper with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the exterior. water-repellent coating treatments historically relied on perfluorinated compounds (PFAS), though some manufacturers have shifted to fluorine-free alternatives; Columbia does not publicly disclose which chemistry they use on this model. The shoe also includes synthetic rubber or EVA foam outsole, mesh lining, and adhesive assembly points where leaching of volatile organics or heavy metals is theoretically possible but uncommon in major brand footwear.
The brand's record and disclosure
Columbia Sportswear has not published a comprehensive PFAS elimination commitment or material transparency report comparable to outdoor leaders like Patagonia or The North Face. The company does not disclose water-repellent coating chemistry on product labels or websites for the Redmond line. No public recalls or safety controversies specific to Columbia footwear water-repellent coating treatments have been documented, but the lack of voluntary disclosure means end-users cannot verify whether PFAS is present or confirm use of safer fluorine-free alternatives.
How it compares in its category
The Redmond sits in the mid-range hiking-shoe segment where water-repellent coating is standard across almost all brands. Competitors like Salomon, Merrell, and ASICS similarly do not disclose water-repellent coating chemistry on entry-to-mid-tier models, making this shoe typical rather than exceptional in transparency. Premium brands (Patagonia, Arc'teryx) increasingly specify fluorine-free water-repellent coating or publish PFAS roadmaps; budget alternatives often use identical coatings with no disclosure, so Columbia's silence reflects industry norm rather than outlier risk.
If you buy it
Wash the shoe gently in cool water and mild detergent; aggressive scrubbing or hot water can degrade water-repellent coating and increase risk of breakdown-related leaching. Air-dry away from direct heat (avoid radiators, dryers) to prevent adhesive or foam degradation. Replace when the outsole shows significant wear or the upper develops seam separation, typically 300-500 miles of use. If water-repellent coating performance declines noticeably before sole wear, re-application with a third-party fluorine-free spray is available as an alternative to replacement.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
water-repellent coating chemistry (PFAS status unknown)
Columbia does not disclose whether the water-repellent coating finish on Redmond uppers uses legacy PFAS or newer fluorine-free formulations. Without transparency, PFAS presence cannot be ruled out but is not confirmed by testing or recall data.
Azo dyes in synthetic fabrics
No public safety incidents or test results linking Columbia Redmond footwear to azo dye contamination have been reported. Standard outdoor footwear from major brands typically meets international textile dye standards, and no evidence suggests Columbia violates these norms.
Formaldehyde in adhesives and resin finishes
Shoe assembly adhesives and fabric stiffeners may contain formaldehyde-releasing compounds; however, no recalls or documented complaints specific to Columbia Redmond off-gassing have surfaced. Off-gassing risk is generally lower in outdoor footwear than in upholstered indoor furniture.
Heavy metals in synthetic rubber outsole or dyes
Columbia, as a large apparel manufacturer, is subject to consumer product safety testing and restrictions on lead and cadmium in footwear. No public test results or violations have been recorded for this model.
Microplastic shedding from synthetic upper during wear and washing
Nylon or polyester fabric uppers shed microfibers during normal wear and laundering, contributing to aquatic microplastic pollution. This is a material-class issue affecting nearly all synthetic hiking shoes, not unique to Columbia, but worth awareness for environmental rather than direct-health reasons.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
More hiking shoes & trail runners grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.