PFAS score
Calphalon · Pressure Cookers
Calphalon Premier Space Saving 8 Quart Hard Anodized Nonstick Multi-Pot with Lid
Skip until Calphalon discloses nonstick chemistry or provides PFAS testing.
Calphalon does not publicly specify whether this hard-anodized pot uses Teflon-type coating, other Teflon-family coating, or PFAS-free nonstick technology. The coating composition remains undisclosed. Without third-party testing or a clear PFAS-free claim from the brand, the PFAS risk cannot be ruled out.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Hard-anodized aluminum with proprietary nonstick coating (unspecified)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed
Marketed non-stick without stating the coating chemistry.
Category baseline
cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Pressure Cookers
Zavor
LUX Edge 6-Qt. Multicooker Cookbook
Paper/cardboard cookbook; not cookware
Not applicable, this is a cookbook, not cookware hardware.
⚠Risky category by default
Presto
23 Quart Induction Pressure Canner
Stainless steel and aluminum construction
Lower PFAS concern, stainless/aluminum pressure canner with no nonstick coating.
⚠Risky category by default
All American
Aluminum Pressure Cooker IMUSA
aluminum with stainless steel interior
Lower PFAS concern, non-coated aluminum/stainless cooker, but brand makes no PFAS statement.
⚠Risky category by default
More pressure cookers grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.