75/ 100
C
OverallD67/100
Bonnie n' Clyde Unscented Deodorant Family Size

Bonnie & Clyde · Deodorant

Bonnie n' Clyde Unscented Deodorant Family Size

C · Moderate

Lower PFAS concern for unscented mineral deodorant, but brand offers no public transparency.

Verdict: BuyTalc-based unscented deodorant with lower PFAS risk; no major safety recalls on record. Brand silence on sourcing is a transparency gap, not a safety red flag.

Bonnie & Clyde's unscented deodorant is a dry powder formulation with no known water-resistance, nonstick, or stain-repellent coatings, the typical vectors for PFAS in cosmetics. However, the brand makes no public statement on PFAS avoidance or testing. No third-party certifications are evident.

Shop Bonnie & Clyde on Amazon →

Material

talc or mineral-based dry powder

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Bonnie & Clyde's unscented formula is talc or mineral-based dry powder, which avoids liquid hydrophobic coatings that typically introduce PFAS. Talc itself carries a separate risk profile: potential asbestos contamination in mining and processing, though modern cosmetic-grade talc is regulated for purity in the US and EU. The unscented designation means no fragrance allergens or masking chemicals. Powder deodorants generally have a simpler chemistry than antiperspirant gels, reducing the number of potential irritants.

The brand's record and disclosure

Bonnie & Clyde does not publicly disclose talc sourcing, mining standards, or third-party testing for asbestos or heavy metal contamination. The brand has not sought major certifications (e.g., NSF, EWG Verified, or cruelty-free seals) that would signal transparency. No significant recalls or safety controversies are on record for this specific product or brand. The silence on supply chain and ingredient sourcing reflects a wider industry norm among mid-tier natural deodorant brands, but it limits independent verification.

How it compares in its category

Unscented mineral deodorants are a lower-risk category overall compared to antiperspirants (which contain aluminum compounds) or scented formulas (which may contain fragrance allergens and masking agents). Bonnie & Clyde's product sits in the mainstream natural deodorant middle tier: safer than conventional aluminum-zirconium antiperspirants, but less transparent than certified organic or third-party tested brands. Powder formats avoid the emulsifier and preservative load of cream deodorants, reducing contact dermatitis risk for some users.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry place away from humidity to prevent caking and microbial growth in the powder. Apply sparingly to clean, dry skin to minimize irritation; some users may need patch testing first if sensitive to talc or mineral powders. Replace when product shows signs of compaction, discoloration, or odor change (typically 6-12 months depending on use). Avoid inhaling powder directly during application; use a shake-and-swipe method rather than opening near your face.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Talc contamination (asbestos risk)

Talc ore can be contaminated with asbestos during mining. Cosmetic-grade talc sold in the US and EU is supposed to be tested and certified asbestos-free, but Bonnie & Clyde does not publish third-party testing data or sourcing standards. This is an industry-wide transparency issue, not a brand-specific recall.

None known

Heavy metals in mineral powders

Talc and other mineral powders can occasionally contain trace lead or cadmium depending on geological source. No specific contamination has been reported for this brand. Standard cosmetic regulations require limits, but Bonnie & Clyde does not publicly disclose testing.

None known

Fragrance allergens

This product is marketed as unscented, so fragrance-related contact dermatitis and respiratory sensitization are not a concern here. This is a strength relative to scented deodorants.

None known

Formaldehyde releasers

Powder deodorants typically avoid preservative systems that release formaldehyde (common in liquid/cream formulas). No data suggests Bonnie & Clyde uses these agents, and the unscented, anhydrous format makes them unlikely.

Possible

Skin irritation from mineral particles

Some users experience irritation or folliculitis from talc or mineral powder deodorants, especially on shaved or sensitive skin. This is user-dependent, not a manufacturing defect, but relevant for sensitive individuals considering this product.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower concern, mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower-concern deodorant; mineral-based formula with PFAS-free claim aligns with brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Antiperspirant Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Antiperspirant Deodorant

mineral-based active ingredients, plant-derived botanicals, no synthetic water-repellent coatings

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower PFAS concern, mineral-based formula with MADE SAFE cert; antiperspirant category has minimal waterproof-coating risk.

MADE SAFE CertifiedLeaping Bunny (cruelty-free)

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.