Ban · Deodorant
LION Ban Premium Gold Label Sweat Block Deodorant Stick
Lower concern; typical deodorant with no known PFAS triggers.
Ban Premium Gold is a standard cosmetic deodorant stick. No waterproofing, nonstick, or stain-resist coatings, typical ingredients (waxes, talc, starch) carry lower PFAS risk. No public PFAS claim or testing available.
Shop Ban on Amazon →Material
Deodorant stick, wax/starch/talc base typical
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Ban Premium Gold is a solid stick deodorant based on wax, starch, and talc as the primary dry carriers, with aluminum zirconium as the active antiperspirant. The formulation is designed to reduce moisture and odor without requiring propellant spray, which eliminates inhalation risk from pressurized aerosols. Talc-based deodorant sticks have been used safely for decades when applied topically to underarms in normal quantities, though talc sourcing and purity standards vary by manufacturer.
The brand's record and disclosure
Edgewell Personal Care (Ban's parent company) has not issued public statements regarding PFAS use in Ban deodorants, nor has the product faced FDA warning letters or recalls related to talc contamination or heavy metals. Ban does not carry third-party certifications (e.g., EWG Verified, Leaping Bunny) on this product line. The brand has maintained a stable market presence without documented safety controversies specific to this formulation.
How it compares in its category
Ban Premium Gold sits in the mainstream antiperspirant category alongside Secret, Degree, and Dove; all rely on aluminum salts and talc or starch as dry carriers. Unlike natural/talc-free alternatives (e.g., Natives, Schmidts), it prioritizes antiperspirant efficacy over mineral-free claims, which appeals to heavy perspirers. Compared to aerosol sprays, the stick format eliminates concerns about inhaled particles and fragrance volatiles.
If you buy it
Apply to clean, dry underarms once daily or as needed; avoid application to broken skin or immediately after shaving to minimize irritation. Store in a cool, dry place to prevent melting or separation of wax from powder. Replace when the stick is depleted or if you notice rancid odor (sign of oxidized wax). Discontinue use if persistent rash, burning, or allergic reaction develops and patch-test on a small area first if you have sensitive skin.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Talc contamination with asbestos or heavy metals
No recalls or contamination reports are on record for Ban Premium Gold specifically. Talc mining and processing standards in the U.S. are regulated by FDA and require asbestos-free certification; however, no independent third-party testing of this product line has been publicly disclosed.
Aluminum zirconium systemic absorption
Aluminum antiperspirant salts are absorbed transdermally at low levels; long-term safety is considered acceptable by FDA and dermatological consensus, though some consumers avoid aluminum-based products due to unproven links to Alzheimer's. This is a category-wide consideration, not unique to Ban.
Fragrance allergens and sensitization
Ban Premium Gold contains added fragrance, which may trigger contact dermatitis or allergic response in individuals with fragrance sensitivity. The product does not disclose specific fragrance ingredients (typically protected as trade secrets), limiting ability to avoid known allergens like limonene or linalool.
Wax base oxidation and rancidity
Over time, wax carriers can oxidize if exposed to heat or light, leading to off-odors or minor skin irritation. Storage in cool conditions minimizes this; no field reports of premature degradation or safety incidents have been documented.
Skin irritation from antimicrobial additives
Some Ban formulations may contain triclosan or other antimicrobials (though regulatory trends have phased many out). If present, these can cause contact sensitization in susceptible individuals; Ban does not clearly disclose antimicrobial ingredients on typical product labels.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 70% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Deodorant
Tom's of Maine
Deodorant
mineral-based, baking soda formulation
Lower concern, mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.
⚠Risky category by default
Tom's of Maine
Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle
mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation
Lower-concern deodorant; mineral-based formula with PFAS-free claim aligns with brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.
⚠Risky category by default
Tom's of Maine
Antiperspirant Deodorant
mineral-based active ingredients, plant-derived botanicals, no synthetic water-repellent coatings
Lower PFAS concern, mineral-based formula with MADE SAFE cert; antiperspirant category has minimal waterproof-coating risk.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
More deodorant grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.