Ban · Deodorant
Ban Invisible Solid Antiperspirant Deodorant
Lower concern; no known PFAS-prone treatment in standard solid antiperspirant.
Ban Invisible Solid uses conventional wax and mineral formulation without water-repellent coatings or non-stick treatments associated with PFAS. No brand PFAS disclosure found, but product category poses minimal risk.
Shop Ban on Amazon →Material
Wax and mineral-based solid stick
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Ban Invisible Solid is a paraffin-wax and mineral-oil based stick antiperspirant, the most common formulation in mass-market deodorants. The solid matrix minimizes need for emulsifiers, solvents, or propellants that trigger contamination concerns in sprays or gels. Aluminum compounds (typically aluminum chlorohydrate) deliver the antiperspirant effect; they are localized to skin application with minimal systemic absorption at typical use levels. No fragrance allergen list is publicly disclosed by the brand, but the product uses standard synthetic fragrance blends common across Ban's line.
The brand's record and disclosure
Ban (SC Johnson subsidiary) does not publish detailed ingredient sourcing, heavy-metal testing, or fragrance component transparency. The brand has not faced major safety recalls or contamination lawsuits in recent decades. No third-party certifications (clean beauty, dermatologist endorsement, or fragrance-free status) are claimed. Ban's parent company has faced historical criticism on transparency but maintains compliance with FDA cosmetic regulations and CLP labeling in EU markets.
How it compares in its category
Solid stick antiperspirants like Ban rank lower-risk than spray deodorants (no inhalation concerns) and aluminum-free natural sticks (which often substitute untested essential oils or plant extracts). Ban Invisible is a conservative, well-tested formulation used by millions; it is mid-tier in transparency compared to indie brands that publish third-party safety data, but ahead of no-disclosure budget brands. The product has stable market presence, indicating consistent manufacturing and no endemic quality-control red flags.
If you buy it
Apply to clean, dry skin in thin strokes; avoid open cuts or irritated underarm skin, as aluminum salts can sting. Store below 25C to prevent the wax base softening and deforming in the stick. Replace every 6-8 weeks for hygiene. If you develop rash, contact dermatitis, or axillary irritation after first use, patch-test on inner arm before reuse. Rinse hands immediately after application to avoid accidental ingestion residue.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Aluminum salts (systemic absorption risk)
Antiperspirant aluminum chlorohydrate is applied topically; dermal penetration is low under normal use. Long-term daily exposure remains epidemiologically debated but not established as a toxicity hazard at deodorant concentrations. Ban does not disclose aluminum compound type or concentration.
Fragrance allergens and sensitizers
Ban Invisible lists fragrance as an ingredient but does not itemize components. Synthetic fragrance blends may contain limonene, linalool, or other sensitizers that trigger contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals. No allergen disclosure is provided.
Talc or talc-like powder excipients
No talc is identified in Ban Invisible Solid's published formulation. Solid stick products typically use starch or silica as absorbers, not talc, reducing asbestos contamination risk.
Heavy metals in colorants (iron oxides, mica)
Ban Invisible Solid uses approved FD&C colorants and mica; no lead, cadmium, or arsenic contamination has been reported or recalled. Standard cosmetic pigment sourcing applies.
Formaldehyde releasers or preservative reactions
Solid wax sticks do not rely on aqueous preservatives that generate formaldehyde (such as DMDM hydantoin). Ban's formulation appears to use paraben or phenolic preservatives; no known formaldehyde-release issue has been documented.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Deodorant
Tom's of Maine
Deodorant
mineral-based, baking soda formulation
Lower concern, mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.
⚠Risky category by default
Tom's of Maine
Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle
mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation
Lower-concern deodorant; mineral-based formula with PFAS-free claim aligns with brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.
⚠Risky category by default
Tom's of Maine
Antiperspirant Deodorant
mineral-based active ingredients, plant-derived botanicals, no synthetic water-repellent coatings
Lower PFAS concern, mineral-based formula with MADE SAFE cert; antiperspirant category has minimal waterproof-coating risk.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
More deodorant grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.