Ban · Deodorant
Ban Deodorant Invisible Solid
Lower concern. Standard deodorant formula, no known PFAS triggers.
Ban Invisible Solid uses conventional wax and talc formulation typical of solid deodorants, with no waterproofing or stain-resist coatings that typically require PFAS. No public PFAS disclosures or third-party testing available.
Shop Ban on Amazon →Material
stearic acid, talc, wax base
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Ban Invisible Solid is a wax-based stick deodorant built on stearic acid (a fatty acid emollient), talc (moisture-absorbing mineral), and wax binders. This formulation is typical for antiperspirant-free deodorants and is chemically stable at room temperature, meaning no volatile off-gassing or thermal degradation during normal use. Stearic acid and wax do not leach into skin under standard application.
The brand's record and disclosure
Henkel (Ban's parent company) does not publish detailed fragrance or talc sourcing transparency on this product's label or website. Ban has no documented recalls for this specific product in FDA or CPSC databases. The brand has not made public commitments to talc testing or heavy-metal screening in cosmetics, which is routine for some competitors but not mandatory.
How it compares in its category
Solid stick deodorants using talc are industry standard and generally safer than aerosol sprays (no inhalation risk) or gel formulas (lower dermal irritation). Products with certified talc (asbestos-free) or talc-free alternatives exist but cost more. Ban's formula sits in the conventional, unspecialized middle of the market with no unusual additives.
If you buy it
Store in a cool, dry place to prevent wax bloom or softening. Replace when depleted or if visible cracks appear in the stick. Apply sparingly to underarms; excess does not improve efficacy and increases skin contact time. Discontinue if rash or irritation develops; talc sensitivity is rare but possible in individuals with sensitive skin.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Talc (asbestos contamination risk)
No recalls or positive asbestos tests reported for Ban Invisible Solid. Talc sourcing and testing practices are not publicly disclosed by the brand, so third-party verification is unavailable. Industry-wide talc is regulated but not systematically tested by manufacturers for consumer deodorants.
Fragrance allergens and sensitizers
Ban lists 'fragrance' as a proprietary blend without ingredient breakdown. Common deodorant fragrances (synthetic musks, cinnamaldehyde) can trigger contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals. No specific fragrance scandal or widespread complaints tied to this product are on record.
Heavy metals in colorants or mineral fillers
No FDA or independent testing has flagged lead, cadmium, or arsenic in Ban Invisible Solid. Talc and wax bases are low-risk for metal accumulation, but cosmetic colorants are not routinely disclosed or tested by the brand.
Formaldehyde or formaldehyde-releasing preservatives
Solid stick deodorants rely on low water content and wax/stearic acid stability, reducing preservative need. No formaldehyde or DMDM hydantoin are listed in available product information for this formula.
1,4-dioxane (manufacturing byproduct in ethoxylated ingredients)
Ban Invisible Solid does not list ethoxylated surfactants or emulsifiers (e.g., polysorbates), so 1,4-dioxane contamination is unlikely. No third-party testing of this product for dioxane is publicly available.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Deodorant
Tom's of Maine
Deodorant
mineral-based, baking soda formulation
Lower concern, mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.
⚠Risky category by default
Tom's of Maine
Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle
mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation
Lower-concern deodorant; mineral-based formula with PFAS-free claim aligns with brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.
⚠Risky category by default
Tom's of Maine
Antiperspirant Deodorant
mineral-based active ingredients, plant-derived botanicals, no synthetic water-repellent coatings
Lower PFAS concern, mineral-based formula with MADE SAFE cert; antiperspirant category has minimal waterproof-coating risk.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
More deodorant grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.