75/ 100
C
OverallD67/100
Arm & Hammer Dental Care Advance White Toothpaste

Arm & Hammer · Toothpaste

Arm & Hammer Dental Care Advance White Toothpaste

C · Moderate

Lower concern; standard toothpaste with no known PFAS vectors, but Arm & Hammer has not publicly committed to PFAS-free formulation.

Verdict: BuyStandard fluoride toothpaste with no established safety red flags; sodium bicarbonate and silica abrasives are well-tolerated; brand transparency is modest but not a safety barrier.

Arm & Hammer Dental Care Advance White is a conventional fluoride toothpaste with no inherent mechanism (nonstick coating, water-resistant treatment, grease-barrier packaging) that typically triggers PFAS use. Standard toothpaste ingredients pose lower PFAS risk than cosmetics with waterproofing or long-wear claims.

Shop Arm & Hammer on Amazon →

Material

aqueous gel/paste with fluoride, silica abrasive, glycerin, sodium bicarbonate

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Arm & Hammer Advance White is an aqueous gel formulation built on sodium bicarbonate (baking soda), silica abrasive, glycerin humectant, and sodium fluoride (0.243% fluoride ion). Sodium bicarbonate and silica are both low-toxicity abrasives approved for oral use by the FDA and widely used in mainstream toothpastes. Glycerin is a common humectant that softens the paste and poses no safety concern at typical concentrations. The fluoride level is standard for U.S. toothpastes and falls within recommended ranges for cavity prevention.

The brand's record and disclosure

Arm & Hammer (Church & Dwight Co., Inc.) does not publicly commit to PFAS-free formulations or publish detailed ingredient safety statements specific to this product line. The brand does not list third-party certifications such as Natural Products Association or EWG Verified on this formulation. However, Arm & Hammer has no documented recalls or safety violations tied to this toothpaste, and the parent company maintains basic regulatory compliance. Transparency on PFAS testing or exclusion remains absent, which is typical for many mainstream oral care brands.

How it compares in its category

This product sits in the middle tier of fluoride toothpastes: simpler formula than premium brands (no whitening enzymes or exotic actives), standard abrasive system, and no added novelty ingredients. Compared to whitening toothpastes with chemical peroxide or hydrogen peroxide boosters, this relies on physical abrasion and low-concentration chemical whiteners, reducing bleaching risk. Compared to sensitivity or prescription toothpastes, it offers no specialized desensitizers, making it suitable for general use but not targeted therapy. Sodium bicarbonate formulations are gentle relative to silica-heavy competitors.

If you buy it

Use twice daily with a pea-sized amount; do not swallow. For children under 6, supervise brushing and use only a rice-grain amount to minimize fluoride ingestion. The paste is stable at room temperature and requires no special storage beyond keeping the cap closed to prevent drying. Replace the tube every 3 months or sooner if the cap is left open frequently. No heating, microwaving, or exposure to direct sunlight is necessary or recommended; normal bathroom storage is adequate.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Fluoride toxicity (ingestion)

Toothpaste fluoride (0.243%) is safe when used as directed and expectorated; risk applies primarily to accidental ingestion by young children. The American Dental Association and FDA consider this concentration and usage pattern safe, but cumulative swallowing of multiple tubes over time or high single-dose ingestion can pose concern. Supervise children under 6 and limit quantity per brushing.

None known

Silica abrasive irritation

Silica abrasives are approved for toothpaste and are not classified as respiratory hazards when used as a paste in the mouth. No established recalls or safety warnings for this product or silica abrasives in toothpaste at typical concentrations. Gum recession or enamel wear risk is low with gentle brushing and this moderate-abrasion formulation.

Possible

Fragrance and flavor allergens

Arm & Hammer Advance White contains flavor and fragrance compounds typical of whitening toothpastes, which are not itemized on the label (grouped as proprietary). Mint and whitening additives can trigger oral sensitivity or allergic contact reactions in susceptible individuals. If you experience mouth irritation, white patches, or burning, discontinue and consult a dentist.

None known

Sodium content (systemic absorption)

The sodium bicarbonate and sodium fluoride base do contribute sodium; however, the amount absorbed through oral mucosa during normal brushing and expectoration is negligible compared to dietary intake. No established health advisory exists for toothpaste sodium levels in this formulation. Persons on strict sodium-restricted diets may prefer non-sodium alternatives, but safety risk from this produc

None known

Glycerin sweetness and cavity risk (if swallowed)

Glycerin is a humectant and does not ferment like sugar; it is not cariogenic. The sweetening agents used in this formulation are typically sorbitol or saccharin, both non-nutritive and approved for oral care. No increased cavity risk from swallowing small amounts during normal use.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 78% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Toothpaste

Davids Toothpaste

Davids

Toothpaste

natural mineral-based formula (calcium carbonate, hydroxyapatite)

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS1 flag

Lower PFAS concern; natural formula toothpaste with clean ingredient transparency.

Risky category by default

Davids Natural Toothpaste Peppermint Charcoal

Davids

Natural Toothpaste Peppermint Charcoal

Charcoal, glycerin, hydrated silica, natural flavor, mineral base

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower-concern toothpaste; charcoal formulation has no inherent PFAS risk and carries third-party safety certification.

MADE SAFE Certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Native Fluoride Free Toothpaste

Native

Fluoride Free Toothpaste

toothpaste base: glycerin, xylitol, silica; fluoride-free formula

A
C
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower PFAS concern; fluoride-free formulation and standard toothpaste ingredients present negligible PFAS risk.

Risky category by default

More toothpaste grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.