75/ 100
C
OverallD67/100
Arm & Hammer Complete Care Toothpaste

Arm & Hammer · Toothpaste

Arm & Hammer Complete Care Toothpaste

C · Moderate

Lower PFAS concern, standard toothpaste formula with no known Teflon-family coating or water-repellent coating triggers.

Verdict: BuyStandard toothpaste with no established safety concerns; aqueous gel base and fluoride formulation carry well-understood low risk profiles.

Arm & Hammer Complete Care is a conventional aqueous toothpaste gel with no documented PFAS-associated materials (no Teflon-type coating, stain resistance, or waterproofing claims). The brand makes no PFAS disclosure, but toothpaste is rarely formulated with PFAS. No third-party verification or lab data available.

Shop Arm & Hammer on Amazon →

Material

Aqueous gel base (water, sorbitol, glycerin, hydrated silica), sodium fluoride, flavoring agents

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Arm & Hammer Complete Care uses a water-based gel suspension with sorbitol and glycerin as humectants, hydrated silica as a mild abrasive, and sodium fluoride (0.243% fluoride ion, standard cavity-prevention dose). This formulation is chemically stable and designed to remain in the oral cavity briefly before rinsing, minimizing systemic absorption risk. The aqueous gel base presents no known leaching hazards typical of some solid or oil-based products.

The brand's record and disclosure

Arm & Hammer (Church & Dwight Co.) does not publicly market third-party safety certifications for this toothpaste, though sodium fluoride toothpastes are FDA-regulated OTC drugs subject to monograph standards. The brand has not faced established recalls or safety controversies specific to this Complete Care line. Parent company disclosures on chemical transparency remain limited but do not show red-flag history in oral care.

How it compares in its category

This product sits in the mainstream fluoride toothpaste segment with formulation chemistry indistinguishable from dozens of competitors (Colgate, Crest, store brands). The baking soda positioning (Arm & Hammer's signature) adds mild alkalinity and flavor appeal but no documented safety differentiation. Abrasive levels (hydrated silica) are consistent with non-whitening standard formulas and pose no elevated enamel-wear risk with normal brushing.

If you buy it

Use as directed (pea-sized amount for children under 6, brush twice daily). Store in cool, dry conditions and discard if the cap is left open for extended periods, as the gel can dry out and separate. Do not ingest; spit after brushing. Fluoride toothpaste is safe for routine use; no special handling or replacement schedule beyond normal tube depletion is required.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Fluoride ingestion risk (pediatric)

Sodium fluoride at standard OTC strength (0.24%) is safe when used as directed but presents a minor risk if swallowed in large amounts by very young children. Arm & Hammer does not prominently highlight pediatric dosing on all packaging variants; follow ADA guidance (pea-sized for under-6).

None known

Abrasive silica (enamel wear)

Hydrated silica abrasive is mild and RDA (relative dentin abrasivity) levels for this product fall within safe ranges for routine use. No established enamel damage complaints tied to this specific formulation.

Possible

Flavor additives and allergen sensitivity

Flavoring agents (often synthetic mint or cinnamon compounds) can trigger sensitivity in some users with fragrance or cinnamaldehyde sensitivities. Arm & Hammer does not itemize exact fragrance components publicly, limiting transparency for allergy-prone consumers.

None known

Glycerin and sorbitol tolerance

These humectants are well-tolerated in oral formulations and carry no established toxicity at toothpaste concentrations. No recalls or complaints specific to these ingredients in this product line.

None known

Formaldehyde-releasing preservatives

No evidence of formaldehyde releasers (such as imidazolidinyl urea) in published Arm & Hammer Complete Care ingredient lists. Standard toothpaste preservation relies on pH and water activity, not problematic preservative classes.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 78% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Toothpaste

Davids Toothpaste

Davids

Toothpaste

natural mineral-based formula (calcium carbonate, hydroxyapatite)

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS1 flag

Lower PFAS concern; natural formula toothpaste with clean ingredient transparency.

Risky category by default

Davids Natural Toothpaste Peppermint Charcoal

Davids

Natural Toothpaste Peppermint Charcoal

Charcoal, glycerin, hydrated silica, natural flavor, mineral base

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower-concern toothpaste; charcoal formulation has no inherent PFAS risk and carries third-party safety certification.

MADE SAFE Certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Native Fluoride Free Toothpaste

Native

Fluoride Free Toothpaste

toothpaste base: glycerin, xylitol, silica; fluoride-free formula

A
C
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower PFAS concern; fluoride-free formulation and standard toothpaste ingredients present negligible PFAS risk.

Risky category by default

More toothpaste grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.