Antiperspirant Driclor · Deodorant
Driclor Solution Roll On Applicator 20ml
Lower concern; typical antiperspirant without known PFAS triggers.
Driclor is an aluminum chloride solution antiperspirant with no disclosed water-repellent or stain-resistant coatings. Roll-on applicators and aqueous solutions carry minimal PFAS risk profile, though brand discloses nothing about PFAS sourcing.
Shop Antiperspirant Driclor on Amazon →Material
aqueous solution (aluminum chloride hexahydrate base), roll-on applicator housing
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Driclor Solution is a liquid antiperspirant based on aluminum chloride hexahydrate (typically 20% w/v), dissolved in water with stabilizing agents. Aluminum chloride works by forming a plug in the sweat duct to reduce perspiration; it is considerably more potent than the aluminum salts in standard antiperspirants. The roll-on applicator dispenses this solution directly onto skin, minimizing waste and controlling dose. This formulation is well-established in dermatology and has been used for decades, though it is stronger and more likely to irritate sensitive skin than conventional products.
The brand's record and disclosure
Driclor is manufactured by Stiefel (part of GlaxoSmithKline) and marketed as a pharmaceutical-grade antiperspirant in many countries, often available by prescription or over-the-counter depending on region. The brand has a long clinical history with no major safety recalls or public health warnings on record. Driclor does not prominently advertise sustainability or third-party certifications; product labeling focuses on efficacy and strength rather than ingredient transparency beyond the active component. No documented controversies regarding manufacturing practices or undisclosed additives have been established in public health databases.
How it compares in its category
Driclor is a higher-strength antiperspirant compared to mass-market roll-ons and sprays; it sits between consumer deodorants and prescription-grade formulations like drysol. Its aluminum chloride concentration is significantly higher than typical consumer antiperspirants (which use aluminum zirconium or aluminum hydroxide), making it more effective for heavy sweating but also more likely to cause skin irritation. Users seeking gentler alternatives might choose aluminum-free or lower-concentration products; those with hyperhidrosis often find Driclor's potency justifies the irritation risk.
If you buy it
Apply to clean, dry skin only; applying to wet skin increases irritation risk. Start with small amounts on underarms and allow to dry fully before dressing to prevent staining and to reduce skin reactions. If irritation, itching, or rash develops, reduce frequency or discontinue and consult a dermatologist. Store at room temperature away from heat; do not expose to direct sunlight or temperatures above 25C, as heat may destabilize the formulation. The 20ml bottle typically lasts 2-3 months with daily use; replace if the solution becomes discolored or develops odor.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Aluminum systemic absorption and renal impact
Aluminum chloride can be absorbed through skin, particularly in high-concentration antiperspirants like Driclor. Long-term use has been studied for potential links to renal function and bone health; regulatory bodies (FDA, SCCS) have set safe limits for dermal aluminum exposure, and Driclor at recommended doses remains within those limits, but users with existing kidney disease should consult a ph
Skin irritation and contact dermatitis
Aluminum chloride is corrosive at high concentration and commonly triggers localized irritation, erythema, burning, or itching, especially on freshly shaved or broken skin. This is a known and expected side effect of high-strength antiperspirants and is not a product defect, but users with sensitive skin or eczema have higher risk and may not tolerate Driclor.
Heavy metals in trace additives or water source
No recalls or test data for lead, cadmium, or other heavy metals in Driclor have been documented. As a regulated pharmaceutical product in most markets, the aqueous formulation is subject to pharmacopeial purity standards, making heavy metal contamination unlikely, though independent testing is not publicly available.
Microorganism growth if applicator is contaminated or stored improperly
The aqueous base supports bacterial growth if the roll-on head contacts non-sterile surfaces or if the bottle is stored in damp, warm conditions. Users should avoid touching the applicator to anything other than skin and keep the cap tightly sealed; however, properly stored and handled Driclor carries no greater microbial risk than any liquid cosmetic.
Fragrance allergen sensitivity or undisclosed fragrance components
Driclor Solution may contain fragrance or masking agents not always fully itemized on the label; individuals with fragrance sensitivity or Multiple Chemical Sensitivity should patch-test or request a full ingredient disclosure from the manufacturer before regular use.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Deodorant
Tom's of Maine
Deodorant
mineral-based, baking soda formulation
Lower concern, mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.
⚠Risky category by default
Tom's of Maine
Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle
mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation
Lower-concern deodorant; mineral-based formula with PFAS-free claim aligns with brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.
⚠Risky category by default
Tom's of Maine
Antiperspirant Deodorant
mineral-based active ingredients, plant-derived botanicals, no synthetic water-repellent coatings
Lower PFAS concern, mineral-based formula with MADE SAFE cert; antiperspirant category has minimal waterproof-coating risk.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
More deodorant grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.