Antiperspirant Driclor · Deodorant
Driclor Roll On Applicator Antiperspirant 20ml
Lower concern; standard antiperspirant active lacks known PFAS use.
Driclor is a salt-based antiperspirant with no known fluorinated polymer coatings or water-resistant treatments typical of PFAS applications. No public PFAS disclosure found; standard formulation poses lower risk.
Shop Antiperspirant Driclor on Amazon →Material
Aluminium chloride hexahydrate solution in roll-on applicator
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Driclor Roll On contains aluminum chloride hexahydrate, a salt solution that works by forming a plug in sweat ducts. Unlike Teflon-type coating-based nonstick coatings or phthalate-softened plastics, aluminum chloride is a simple mineral compound with no known involvement in endocrine disruption or persistent bioaccumulation at consumer-use concentrations. The roll-on applicator is typically plastic with a rotary ball; the hazard profile depends on applicator material identity, which Driclor does not publicly disclose in detail.
The brand's record and disclosure
Driclor (Stiefel/GlaxoSmithKline) maintains a neutral public stance on PFAS and does not advertise third-party safety certifications for this product line. No major product recalls, skin sensitization class actions, or heavy-metal contamination incidents are on record. The brand does not publish ingredient sourcing, manufacturing site audits, or material safety data sheets for consumer-facing variants, a standard industry practice but not a negative flag.
How it compares in its category
Driclor's aluminum chloride concentration (approximately 20%) is higher than typical consumer antiperspirants (e.g., Dove, Secret at 10-15%) but lower than clinical-strength alternatives like Certain Dri. It occupies a mid-tier efficacy position without reported accumulation of safety complaints relative to peers. Roll-on applicators are less prone to inhalation risk than aerosol sprays, reducing Teflon-type coating fume exposure risk common in powder-based formulations.
If you buy it
Apply only to dry skin and avoid contact with eyes, mouth, and broken skin; aluminum chloride is corrosive and can sting on irritated areas. Replace the product if visible mold, separation, or odor changes appear, signaling bacterial colonization in the roll-on ball mechanism. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat; do not microwave or heat the applicator. Discontinue if persistent rash, severe irritation, or hyperpigmentation develops and consult a dermatologist.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Aluminum absorption and systemic exposure
Topical aluminum chloride absorption through intact skin is considered minimal by FDA and dermatology literature, but chronic high-concentration use on large body areas theoretically increases systemic aluminum load. Long-term safety at this concentration (20%) in vulnerable populations (renal impairment, pediatric use) remains incompletely studied in peer review.
Skin irritation and corrosivity
Aluminum chloride is hygroscopic and mildly acidic; users frequently report localized burning, erythema, and allergic contact dermatitis, particularly on sensitive or freshly shaved skin. This is a known use-limitation, not a manufacturing defect, and is documented in product warnings.
Roll-on applicator material leachables
Driclor does not publicly identify the plastic polymer (polypropylene vs. polyethylene vs. PET) of the applicator housing or ball material. If PVC or recycled plastic, phthalate or BPA leaching into the aqueous aluminum chloride solution is theoretically possible but has not been reported or tested in available literature.
Bacterial and fungal growth in roll-on mechanism
The roll-on ball and reservoir create a warm, moist microenvironment where Staphylococcus aureus, Candida, and other skin commensals can proliferate if the applicator is contaminated or stored improperly. Regular cleaning of the ball and cap is not a standard user instruction but could reduce microbial load.
Hyperpigmentation and staining
Long-term use of high-concentration aluminum chloride can cause yellow or brown discoloration of clothing and, rarely, temporary skin staining or hyperpigmentation in sensitive individuals. This is cosmetic rather than a toxicological hazard but indicates chemical reactivity with fabric and melanin.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Deodorant
Tom's of Maine
Deodorant
mineral-based, baking soda formulation
Lower concern, mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.
⚠Risky category by default
Tom's of Maine
Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle
mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation
Lower-concern deodorant; mineral-based formula with PFAS-free claim aligns with brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.
⚠Risky category by default
Tom's of Maine
Antiperspirant Deodorant
mineral-based active ingredients, plant-derived botanicals, no synthetic water-repellent coatings
Lower PFAS concern, mineral-based formula with MADE SAFE cert; antiperspirant category has minimal waterproof-coating risk.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
More deodorant grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.