Antiperspirant Driclor · Deodorant
Driclor Gsl Size Roll On 20Ml
Lower concern; typical antiperspirant without known PFAS use.
Driclor is an aluminum chlorohydrate-based antiperspirant with no disclosed PFAS ingredients or water-resistant coating. Standard cosmetic formulations of this type rarely require PFAS.
Shop Antiperspirant Driclor on Amazon →Material
Aluminum chlorohydrate (active antiperspirant ingredient), glycol-based roll-on formulation
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Driclor GSL uses aluminum chlorohydrate as its active antiperspirant ingredient, a well-established compound that works by forming a plug in sweat ducts. The roll-on delivery uses a glycol-based carrier (typically propylene glycol or similar humectants) to suspend the aluminum salt and provide smooth application. This formulation is chemically stable at room temperature and does not involve problematic polymers or coatings that degrade into secondary hazards. Aluminum chlorohydrate itself has a long safety history in cosmetics, though the concentration and skin contact duration remain factors in individual sensitivity.
The brand's record and disclosure
Driclor is owned by Stiefel Laboratories (part of GlaxoSmithKline consumer healthcare) and is marketed as a prescription-strength antiperspirant in some regions. The brand does not publicly disclose detailed ingredient sourcing, manufacturing audits, or heavy-metal testing results for this product. No significant recalls or safety controversies have been established in public records for Driclor antiperspirant formulations. Ingredient labeling is typically compliant with EU and US regulations, though proprietary glycol blends are common industry practice in this category.
How it compares in its category
Driclor is positioned as a clinical-strength antiperspirant, typically containing 20 percent aluminum chlorohydrate or higher, placing it above standard consumer deodorants (which often use 10-15 percent) but below prescription-only products. Roll-on delivery avoids inhalation risks associated with aerosol or powder formats. Compared to natural alternatives (baking soda, charcoal), Driclor trades broader efficacy for aluminum exposure, a trade-off accepted by mainstream dermatology for appropriate users. The glycol-based formulation is standard across most major antiperspirant brands and carries similar profile risks.
If you buy it
Apply to clean, dry skin (ideally before bed or on dry underarms) to maximize antiperspirant action; wet skin reduces effectiveness and may cause irritation. Do not apply to broken or recently shaved skin; wait 24 hours post-shaving to avoid stinging. Replace or discontinue if persistent redness, itching, or dermatitis develops; some users develop tolerance or sensitivity with long-term use. Store below 25 degrees Celsius in a cool place to maintain formula stability; do not expose to direct sunlight. A 20 ml roll-on typically lasts 2-3 months with daily use.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Aluminum systemic absorption
Aluminum chlorohydrate is applied topically at clinical strength (typically 20 percent); while dermal absorption is generally low, long-term daily use may result in cumulative aluminum exposure. Individuals with kidney dysfunction or those concerned about aluminum bioaccumulation should consult a healthcare provider, though the causality between antiperspirant aluminum and neurological disease rem
Contact dermatitis and skin sensitization
Aluminum chlorohydrate and glycol carriers can trigger allergic contact dermatitis or irritant reactions in a subset of users, particularly on sensitive or recently shaved skin. Case reports exist in dermatology literature, but prevalence in the general population using this specific product is not quantified in public data.
Propylene glycol and glycol-based carrier irritation
Propylene glycol and similar glycols are penetration enhancers and can cause localized irritation or allergic sensitization in vulnerable individuals. The 20 ml roll-on format concentrates product on a small area repeatedly, increasing cumulative exposure risk compared to lighter formulations.
Heavy metal contamination in aluminum salt sourcing
No recalls or published analyses have documented lead, cadmium, or other contaminants in Driclor or related aluminum chlorohydrate formulations. Manufacturing by a major pharmaceutical company (GSK) typically implies standard quality controls, though third-party verification data are not publicly disclosed.
Fragrance allergens (if present in formulation)
Driclor GSL formulations may include fragrance compounds; the product should be checked for fragrance disclosure on packaging. No specific allergen profile for this product variant has been published, but glycol-based antiperspirants can carry fragrance as a standard ingredient.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Deodorant
Tom's of Maine
Deodorant
mineral-based, baking soda formulation
Lower concern, mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.
⚠Risky category by default
Tom's of Maine
Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle
mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation
Lower-concern deodorant; mineral-based formula with PFAS-free claim aligns with brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.
⚠Risky category by default
Tom's of Maine
Antiperspirant Deodorant
mineral-based active ingredients, plant-derived botanicals, no synthetic water-repellent coatings
Lower PFAS concern, mineral-based formula with MADE SAFE cert; antiperspirant category has minimal waterproof-coating risk.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
More deodorant grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.