75/ 100
C
OverallF49/100
Driclor Antiperspirant Roll On Applicator 20 ml, Strong Antiperspirant for Excessive Sweating

Antiperspirant Driclor · Deodorant

Driclor Antiperspirant Roll On Applicator 20 ml, Strong Antiperspirant for Excessive Sweating

C · Moderate

Lower concern; typical antiperspirant without known PFAS triggers.

Verdict: Buy with careAluminum chloride hexahydrate is effective and widely used; monitor for skin irritation and discontinue if sensitivity emerges. Lower PFAS concern typical of antiperspirants.

Driclor is a standard aluminum chloride antiperspirant without disclosed waterproofing, water-repellent coating coatings, or fluorinated ingredients. No public PFAS claims or third-party testing available, but formulation lacks typical PFAS-risk markers.

Shop Antiperspirant Driclor on Amazon →

Material

Aluminum chloride hexahydrate solution in roll-on applicator base

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Driclor's active ingredient is aluminum chloride hexahydrate, a salt solution that works by forming a plug in sweat ducts rather than blocking them systemically like broader-spectrum antiperspirants. This formulation is stronger than standard consumer antiperspirants (typically 15-20% aluminum compounds vs Driclor's higher concentration aimed at hyperhidrosis). The roll-on applicator base contains water, glycerin, and stabilizers; these are low-hazard vehicles but the high aluminum concentration and acidic pH (needed for efficacy) can trigger dermatitis in sensitive skin with repeated or prolonged contact.

The brand's record and disclosure

Driclor is a specialty medical-grade antiperspirant brand with a long history in the hyperhidrosis market and no documented recalls or major safety controversies on public record. The brand does not publish detailed ingredient disclosures or third-party certifications beyond standard regulatory compliance. No formal stance on PFAS or other emerging contaminants has been publicly stated; the product relies on regulatory approval (e.g., UK/EU) as its primary safety credential.

How it compares in its category

Driclor sits at the higher end of antiperspirant strength, positioned as a clinical option for excessive sweating rather than a cosmetic deodorant. Most over-the-counter antiperspirants are gentler formulations (12-15% aluminum) and include additional dermatological agents; Driclor's higher concentration and acidic pH make it more irritating but also more effective for severe cases. Users typically transition to it after standard antiperspirants fail, meaning skin compatibility is a practical prerequisite.

If you buy it

Apply only to clean, dry skin and allow to dry fully before dressing to minimize skin contact and irritation. Use as directed (usually nightly on problem areas); overuse or daily application without breaks increases risk of dermatitis. If rash, burning, or persistent irritation develops, discontinue and consult a dermatologist; some users require alternating brands to prevent tolerance or sensitivity. Keep the roll-on applicator clean and dry between uses to prevent bacterial or fungal growth in the bottle tip.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Aluminum absorption and systemic accumulation

Aluminum chloride penetrates skin more deeply than other aluminum salts due to its high concentration and acidic formulation. Long-term daily use on large surface areas could theoretically increase systemic aluminum load, though no clinical evidence of harm from antiperspirant use alone exists in peer-reviewed literature; persons with kidney disease or aluminum sensitivity should consult a physici

Likely

Contact dermatitis and skin irritation

None known

Formaldehyde releasers

No formaldehyde releasers or formaldehyde-releasing preservatives are listed or known to be present in Driclor's documented formulation. Standard cosmetic preservatives used are not identified on publicly available labels.

None known

Fragrance allergens

Driclor is typically unscented or lightly scented; fragrance allergen load is not a documented concern. Individual sensitivity to any fragrance component is possible but not a category-level risk for this product.

Possible

Microbial contamination in roll-on tip

Roll-on applicators can harbor bacteria or fungi if the bottle tip is not kept clean and dry between applications, particularly in warm or humid environments. This is a maintenance issue rather than a manufacturing defect but warrants user awareness.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower concern, mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower-concern deodorant; mineral-based formula with PFAS-free claim aligns with brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Antiperspirant Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Antiperspirant Deodorant

mineral-based active ingredients, plant-derived botanicals, no synthetic water-repellent coatings

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower PFAS concern, mineral-based formula with MADE SAFE cert; antiperspirant category has minimal waterproof-coating risk.

MADE SAFE CertifiedLeaping Bunny (cruelty-free)

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.