Antiperspirant Driclor · Deodorant
Driclor Anti-perspirant 60ml
Lower concern; no known PFAS triggers, but limited transparency.
Driclor is a standard aluminium chloride antiperspirant without typical PFAS-associated coatings or water-repellent treatments. Brand does not disclose PFAS absence, but product category poses minimal risk.
Shop Antiperspirant Driclor on Amazon →Material
Aluminium chloride active, liquid aqueous solution in plastic bottle
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Driclor is a liquid solution of aluminum chloride hexahydrate in water, typically at 20% concentration, formulated for topical application on skin. Aluminum chloride works by forming insoluble aluminum hydroxide complexes that plug sweat ducts, unlike aluminum salts in standard antiperspirants. The aqueous base minimizes solvent toxicity, though the aluminum concentration is substantially higher than over-the-counter products, making it a prescription-strength or high-potency treatment.
The brand's record and disclosure
Driclor (owned by various manufacturers including Stiefel, now LEO Pharma) has a long market history dating to the 1970s with no major safety recalls in public databases. The brand does not actively market PFAS-free claims; ingredient disclosure is standard and aluminum chloride is clearly listed. No established controversies regarding undisclosed contaminants or regulatory violations are recorded, though transparency on manufacturing standards and heavy metal testing is not explicitly published.
How it compares in its category
Driclor is positioned as a high-strength antiperspirant for hyperhidrosis (excessive sweating), not a cosmetic deodorant. It contains a much higher aluminum concentration than typical roll-ons or sprays, making it more effective but also more prone to irritation if misused. Compared to gentler alternatives like stick antiperspirants or powder-based products, Driclor requires more careful application guidance and is not suitable for daily whole-body use.
If you buy it
Apply only to clean, dry skin in thin layers, typically at night, and allow to dry fully before dressing to minimize skin irritation and staining. Do not use on broken, irritated, or newly shaved skin; wait at least 12-24 hours after shaving. Discontinue immediately if severe dermatitis, swelling, or systemic symptoms occur. Store in a cool place away from direct heat, as the solution can degrade; replace if discoloration or separation occurs.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Aluminum absorption and systemic exposure
Driclor delivers aluminum chloride at high concentration directly to skin; while most aluminum remains at application sites, transdermal absorption can occur, particularly on irritated skin or with occlusion. Long-term exposure profiles are not exhaustively studied in the literature, though regulatory bodies (FDA, EMA) have not issued restrictions on topical aluminum antiperspirants based on avail
Skin irritation and allergic contact dermatitis
Aluminum chloride solutions are known irritants; published case reports document localized burning, erythema, and allergic reactions with this product class, especially in users with sensitive skin or dermatologic conditions. Risk is higher with Driclor than standard antiperspirants due to concentration and is dose-dependent.
Container leachables from plastic bottle
No published recalls or warnings specific to Driclor's plastic packaging leaching contaminants into the solution. The aqueous, acidic nature of aluminum chloride could theoretically promote leaching of plasticizers, but no evidence of this has been documented in regulatory filings or scientific literature for this product.
Hypersensitivity reactions to aluminum salts
Some individuals have documented delayed or immediate hypersensitivity to aluminum compounds; while rare, reactions can range from localized urticaria to angioedema. Patch testing is recommended for users with history of metal sensitivity before regular use of high-potency antiperspirants.
Solution stability and contamination if cap left loose
As a liquid aqueous solution without added preservatives or minimal preservation, Driclor can support microbial growth or evaporation if stored improperly or cap is left unsealed. This is a practical storage hazard rather than an inherent product defect.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Deodorant
Tom's of Maine
Deodorant
mineral-based, baking soda formulation
Lower concern, mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.
⚠Risky category by default
Tom's of Maine
Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle
mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation
Lower-concern deodorant; mineral-based formula with PFAS-free claim aligns with brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.
⚠Risky category by default
Tom's of Maine
Antiperspirant Deodorant
mineral-based active ingredients, plant-derived botanicals, no synthetic water-repellent coatings
Lower PFAS concern, mineral-based formula with MADE SAFE cert; antiperspirant category has minimal waterproof-coating risk.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
More deodorant grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.