Anccer · Waterproof Smartphone & Tech Cases
ANCOVE iPhone 16e Waterproof MagSafe Snowproof Dustproof Shockproof IP68 Certified Real 360 Full
Skip; waterproof coating source unknown, no PFAS disclosure.
Generic third-party iPhone case with IP68 waterproof rating but no material transparency. Waterproof coatings often contain PFAS; brand provides no chemical disclosure or testing data.
The safe swap
Tech21
Tech21 EvoClear for Apple iPhone 17 Pro
85/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned its B.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Plastic case with unspecified waterproof coating
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
Vague safety claims only
Uses vague language ("eco-friendly", "clean") without a specific PFAS statement.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
This is a rigid plastic (likely polycarbonate or TPU blend) phone case with an applied waterproof coating of unspecified chemistry. The coating is the critical unknown: waterproofing in phone cases often relies on Teflon-family coating or other chemicals to repel water, which is why PFAS disclosure matters here. The plastic substrate itself poses minimal inherent toxicity to skin contact, but the coating's durability and leachate profile are opaque.
The brand's record and disclosure
Anccer is a minor accessories brand with no public PFAS policy, third-party certifications for chemical safety, or transparent material sourcing statements. The product claims IP68 certification (water resistance standard) but does not specify which chemicals achieve that barrier. No recalls or documented safety controversies are on public record for this brand, but silence on chemical composition is a red flag for budget-tier phone cases.
How it compares in its category
Phone cases in this price/feature tier often use undisclosed hydrophobic coatings that may contain PFAS or other fluorinated compounds. More transparent competitors (e.g., some OtterBox lines) publish material data sheets or explicitly state non-PFAS formulations. Anccer's case is middle-of-the-road for disclosure; it offers good physical protection but chemical transparency lags premium alternatives.
If you buy it
Avoid prolonged skin contact with the interior coating during application; wash hands afterward. Do not expose to extreme heat (e.g., direct sunlight in hot cars) as this may accelerate coating degradation and potential leaching. Replace the case if the waterproof coating shows visible cracking, peeling, or wear. Periodically clean with a dry cloth; minimize contact with harsh solvents or detergents that could compromise the coating seal.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Waterproof coating composition (non-PFAS)
The coating chemistry is not disclosed. While it may be PFAS-free, alternative water-repellent chemistries (e.g., siloxanes, other fluorinated compounds) carry their own persistence and bioaccumulation concerns if they leach during use or disposal. No testing data is available for this specific product.
Coating degradation and particle release
Waterproof coatings on phone cases can delaminate or flake with age or UV exposure. If the Ancove case's coating deteriorates, microparticles of the coating material could contact skin or be inhaled. Degradation timeline and particle composition are unknown without durability testing.
Plastic substrate leaching
Polycarbonate and TPU plastics used in phone cases do not typically leach BPA or phthalates under normal conditions (room temperature, brief contact). No documented issues exist for Anccer cases specifically. Risk is minimal unless case is heated or left in high-temperature environments.
Adhesive residues from MagSafe attachment
The built-in MagSafe likely uses a metal ring with adhesive backing. Adhesive composition is not disclosed. Contact dermatitis from adhesive residue is rare but possible if skin contact is prolonged; no specific incidents are documented for this product.
Heavy metals in pigments (if colored case)
Modern phone case plastics are unlikely to contain lead or cadmium in colorants, as these are regulated in many markets. No specific testing or complaints are on record for Anccer cases. Risk is low for standard commercial products sold in regulated regions.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Waterproof Smartphone & Tech Cases
Tech21
EvoClear for Apple iPhone 17 Pro
polycarbonate and thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU)
Polycarbonate phone case.
⚠Brand says nothing about PFAS
Apple
TechWoven MagSafe Case for iPhone 17 Pro
Woven fabric composite with elastomer MagSafe attachment
Limited PFAS risk from material choice, but no brand disclosure
⚠Brand says nothing about PFAS
Apple
iPhone 17 Pro Max TechWoven Case with MagSafe
Woven textile blend with MagSafe metal ring
Lower concern; typical smartphone case materials lack PFAS triggers.
⚠Brand says nothing about PFAS
More waterproof smartphone & tech cases grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.