65/ 100
D
OverallF53/100
Adidas Insoles Best Soccer Cleats For Heel Pain KASTWAVE Orthotic Insoles For Plantar Fasciitis Flat Feet Relief 3/4 Len

Adidas · Athletic Insoles & Orthotics

Adidas Insoles Best Soccer Cleats For Heel Pain KASTWAVE Orthotic Insoles For Plantar Fasciitis Flat Feet Relief 3/4 Len

D · Elevated

Lower concern. Standard orthotic insole without obvious PFAS risks.

Verdict: SkipStandard orthotic insole with no established safety red flags; low PFAS concern and typical foam/rubber composition suitable for foot support.

Orthotic insoles typically use foam, fabric, and rubber without water-repellent coatings. Adidas has not disclosed PFAS use in this product category, and standard cushioning materials carry minimal PFAS risk.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Foam cushioning, textile uppers, rubber sole

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This insole uses EVA foam cushioning (ethylene-vinyl acetate), textile uppers, and rubber soles, all common in orthotic footwear. EVA is chemically inert and does not off-gas volatile organic compounds at body temperature or during normal wear. The textile upper is the primary skin-contact surface; any finishing treatments (dyes, resins) would be the main concern. Rubber soles are stable and pose minimal leaching risk in a non-heated, wearable context.

The brand's record and disclosure

Adidas has not made prominent public statements on PFAS in orthotic insoles specifically, though the brand has faced scrutiny over PFAS in athletic footwear more broadly (particularly water-resistant uppers). This KASTWAVE line appears to be a third-party or co-branded orthotic product rather than core Adidas footwear, limiting direct brand accountability. No recall history or chemical testing data is publicly available for this specific SKU. Transparency from Adidas on insole material sourcing remains limited.

How it compares in its category

Orthotic insoles across brands typically use EVA foam, poron, or gel cores with textile or mesh coverings. Adidas-branded versions occupy a mid-market position: more established than off-brand Amazon listings but less premium than clinical orthotic labs (Superfeet, Powerstep). Most retail orthotic insoles lack independent chemical certifications (e.g., GOTS, Oeko-Tex); this product follows industry norms. The main differentiator is fit and orthopedic design rather than material safety.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry location away from direct heat or sunlight, as prolonged exposure can degrade foam. Wash the textile upper occasionally with mild soap and water; do not machine wash or soak. Replace insoles every 12-18 months or when cushioning visibly compresses or flattens. Check for mold or odor if stored in damp conditions, and discard if either appears. If skin irritation develops, remove and allow skin to air-dry; consider sensitivity to textile dyes or adhesives rather than core foam.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Formaldehyde resins in textile finishing

Textile uppers may contain formaldehyde-based resins for wrinkle resistance or dye fixation. New insoles may have a noticeable chemical smell; airing them before first use can reduce volatile release. No specific testing of this SKU is on record.

Possible

Azo dyes in colored textile

Colored textile surfaces could use azo dyes, which may include banned heavy metals (e.g., lead, cadmium) in low-quality batches. Adidas's broader supply chain has faced scrutiny but this orthotic line lacks published test results. Risk is low for non-ingestion use but higher if worn by children who mouth insoles.

Possible

Adhesive or glue leachates

Foam layers are often bonded with polyurethane or rubber-based adhesives. Skin contact with these adhesives is minimal (textile barrier present), but sweat exposure over months could theoretically mobilize trace compounds. No documented cases of reaction from this product.

None known

Microplastic shedding from foam compression

EVA foam does not readily shed microplastics during normal wear or sweat exposure, as it is not friable. This is not a recognized hazard for orthotic insoles in the available literature.

None known

Antimony in synthetic rubber components

Rubber soles may contain trace antimony as a vulcanization catalyst, but concentrations in finished footwear are typically negligible and not bioavailable through skin contact. No safety concern is established for wearing orthotic insoles with standard rubber soles.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More athletic insoles & orthotics grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.