Evercushion Pro insole width mid vs Active Full Insole: which is safer?

Puma Evercushion Pro insole width mid is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Puma Evercushion Pro insole width mid

Puma

Evercushion Pro insole width mid

PFAS grade

D 65/100

Overall grade

F 49/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

foam cushioning, textile upper

Confidence

72%

PossibleFormaldehyde resins in textile finishes

PossibleAzo dyes in synthetic textiles

PossiblePolyurethane foam degradation and particulate shedding

Active Full Insole

Vionic

Active Full Insole

PFAS grade

D 65/100

Overall grade

F 31/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 5

Material

Foam cushioning, textile upper

Confidence

72%

PossibleFormaldehyde resins in textile finishing

LikelyFoam degradation and microparticle shedding

PossibleAdhesive residues between foam and textile

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More athletic insoles & orthotics: see the full ranking