LITA ECO Ultra Thick Cut to Length vs Sporturf 357 Turf Roll Stock: which is safer?

LITA ECO Ultra Thick Cut to Length is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

LITA ECO Ultra Thick Cut to Length

AstroTurf

LITA ECO Ultra Thick Cut to Length

PFAS grade

B 85/100

Overall grade

F 63/100

Verdict

Buy with care

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Synthetic turf fibers (polyethylene/polypropylene backing)

Confidence

45%

PossiblePFAS in backing or adhesives

ReportedMicroplastic shedding from fibers

PossibleLeaching from backing polymers or adhesives

Why this gradeBuy
Sporturf 357 Turf Roll Stock

Sprinturf

Sporturf 357 Turf Roll Stock

PFAS grade

C 75/100

Overall grade

F 53/100

Verdict

Buy with care

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Synthetic turf roll (polyethylene/polypropylene fiber base; backing composition unspecified)

Confidence

25%

PossibleVolatile organic compounds (VOCs) and off-gassing

PossibleAdhesive and backing leachates

ReportedMicroplastic shedding

Why this gradeBuy

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More artificial turf: see the full ranking