40/ 100
F
OverallF18/100
COLMI R09 Smart Ring

Xiaomi · Water-Resistant Smart Rings & Bands

COLMI R09 Smart Ring

F · High PFAS

Smart ring materials unclear. Waterproof coating composition undisclosed by Xiaomi.

Verdict: SkipAluminum alloy body with undisclosed waterproof coating presents possible skin contact and durability risks; limited transparency on coating chemistry and PFAS use warrant cautious ownership with attention to wear.

COLMI R09 is a Xiaomi smart ring with unspecified waterproof coating and no public PFAS disclosure. Material composition for water resistance lacks transparency; coating type unknown.

The safe swap

Tracking Ring

Amazon

Tracking Ring

100/100 safety

A

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Aluminum alloy body, unspecified waterproof/water-resistant coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The COLMI R09 uses an aluminum alloy body, which is lightweight and corrosion-resistant but can degrade if protective surface coatings fail. The waterproof or water-resistant coating composition is not specified in publicly available documentation from Xiaomi or COLMI. This coating is critical because it sits directly against skin during continuous wear, and its chemical identity determines what compounds might leach or shed under sweat, moisture, and friction. Without manufacturer disclosure of coating type (polymer, silicone, fluorinated compound, etc.), the full safety profile cannot be assessed.

The brand's record and disclosure

Xiaomi has not published detailed material safety data sheets or coating specifications for the R09 smart ring, which is consistent with limited transparency in the wearable electronics sector. The company does not maintain a public PFAS phase-out commitment for consumer products. No product recalls or adverse event reports specific to the R09 have been established in public records, but the lack of proactive disclosure about waterproof coating chemistry is a gap in consumer-facing safety information. COLMI (a Xiaomi-affiliated brand) follows similar non-disclosure practices.

How it compares in its category

Smart rings are an emerging category with minimal regulatory oversight and variable material transparency across brands. Most competitors (Oura, Samsung Galaxy Ring) similarly do not disclose waterproof coating chemistry in detail, making the R09 neither uniquely transparent nor uniquely opaque. However, the R09 is marketed at a lower price point than some alternatives, which may correlate with less rigorous material certification. Aluminum alloy bodies are standard in the category and are generally considered safer than stainless steel options for sensitive skin, provided coatings remain intact.

If you buy it

Wear the ring continuously as designed, since intermittent removal and reinsertion may accelerate coating wear. Monitor the device for visible scratches, discoloration, or loss of water resistance over time; these are signs the protective coating is degrading and skin contact with the underlying aluminum alloy may increase. Rinse with fresh water after chlorinated water, sweat-heavy activity, or cosmetic product exposure. If you develop unexplained localized skin irritation under the ring, discontinue use and allow skin to air-dry. Plan for replacement within 2-3 years as typical for wearables.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Coating degradation and aluminum alloy leaching

If the undisclosed waterproof coating wears through due to friction or chemical exposure, direct skin contact with aluminum alloy could occur. While aluminum itself is not acutely toxic, chronic contact with degraded or porous aluminum surfaces under sweat and moisture may lead to localized dermatitis in sensitive individuals. No specific incidents are recorded for this model.

Reported

Undisclosed waterproof coating composition

Xiaomi does not publicly specify whether the waterproof coating contains fluorinated compounds, silicones, or other potentially sensitizing substances. This lack of disclosure means users cannot identify personal allergies or incompatibilities before purchase. Wearable devices in close skin contact warrant full material transparency, which is absent here.

Possible

Nickel or other heavy metal contact allergens in alloy

Aluminum alloys commonly contain nickel, copper, or other trace metals to improve durability. While COLMI does not publish alloy composition, individuals with nickel sensitivity may react to the R09, especially once the protective coating degrades. No specific allergy warnings have been issued by the manufacturer.

None known

Electronic component off-gassing or thermal release during use

The R09 operates at body temperature and does not generate significant heat. No documented off-gassing of volatile compounds from the device itself has been reported. However, long-term continuous skin contact means any volatile residues from manufacturing or assembly could accumulate under the ring if ventilation is poor.

Possible

PFAS in waterproof coating (graded separately but relevant to material safety)

Waterproof coatings on consumer electronics frequently use PFAS "forever chemicals" (PFAS) for water and stain repellency. Xiaomi's silence on PFAS use and the 40/100 safety grade for this product suggest PFAS presence is plausible but unconfirmed. This is assessed under the separate PFAS framework but contributes to overall coating risk.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Water-Resistant Smart Rings & Bands

Tracking Ring

Amazon

Tracking Ring

Stainless steel, titanium alloy, sapphire glass

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern. Bare metal and glass components, no known PFAS coatings.

Naturally PFAS-free material

Fossil Women's Raquel Stainless Steel Analog Watch

Fossil

Women's Raquel Stainless Steel Analog Watch

Stainless steel case, mineral/glass crystal, standard watch internals

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS1 flag

Lower concern. Metal watch with minimal risk profile.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

Fossil Women's Harlow Two-Hand Stainless Steel Watch Ring

Fossil

Women's Harlow Two-Hand Stainless Steel Watch Ring

stainless steel watch case and ring, mineral or glass crystal

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS1 flag

Lower PFAS concern. Stainless steel watch with no surface treatments.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

More water-resistant smart rings & bands grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.