70/ 100
C
OverallD66/100
Viva Multi-Surface Cloth Paper Towels

Viva · Paper Napkins & Paper Towels

Viva Multi-Surface Cloth Paper Towels

C · Moderate

Lower concern; standard paper towels rarely treated with PFAS, but no brand transparency.

Verdict: BuyVirgin wood pulp paper towels with no established hazards; standard product category with low chemical risk and no brand safety record issues.

Viva Multi-Surface paper towels are primarily cellulose with standard paper manufacturing additives. Paper towel products are not typically treated with water-resistant coatings that would require PFAS, though minor sizing agents used in paper production remain unspecified by the brand.

Shop Viva on Amazon →

Material

virgin wood pulp, minor adhesives/sizing

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Viva Multi-Surface Cloth Paper Towels are made from virgin wood pulp (cellulose fibers), with minor adhesives and sizing agents used to bind and finish the sheets. Virgin pulp avoids recycled-content contaminants but requires bleaching and chemical processing typical of all commercial paper towels. The material itself, cellulose, is chemically inert and poses no leaching risk under normal use, since paper towels contact food only briefly and are not heated or stored with food long-term.

The brand's record and disclosure

Kimberly-Clark (Viva's parent company) does not publicly disclose detailed chemical composition or third-party testing results for paper towel products. The company has no documented safety controversies specific to this product line. No recalls or hazard warnings are on record for Viva paper towels. The brand's silence on PFAS reflects industry norm: most manufacturers do not voluntarily test or report PFAS in tissue products, though the risk is considered low.

How it compares in its category

Paper towels are among the safest single-use food-contact items available, regardless of brand. Viva is a mainstream commercial product with no known quality or safety disadvantage versus competitors like Bounty or store brands. The main differentiation is absorbency and durability, not chemical safety. All virgin or recycled pulp paper towels carry identical low hazard profiles unless specifically treated (e.g., antimicrobial additives), which Viva does not claim.

If you buy it

Use Viva paper towels as intended: dry wiping, spill cleanup, and short-term food contact (napkin use). Avoid prolonged contact with hot or greasy foods stored directly on sheets; use as a temporary blotter only. Paper towels degrade with moisture and are not reusable, so discard after single use to avoid bacterial growth if left damp. No special storage precautions are needed beyond keeping the roll dry.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

None known

Bleach residues and chlorine byproducts

Virgin wood pulp paper towels are processed with chlorine or chlorine dioxide for whitening. No residual chlorine or dioxins are expected in the finished product at levels of concern, and no testing data from Viva suggests otherwise.

None known

Adhesives and sizing agents

Minor adhesives and chemical sizing are applied to paper towels for strength and texture. These are food-contact approved (e.g., starch-based or acrylic polymers) and do not leach into food under normal dry use.

None known

Ink or dye in printed patterns

If Viva Multi-Surface uses printed designs, inks are typically soy or mineral-based and food-safe. No recalls or hazard warnings for printed paper towels in this product line are documented.

Possible

Bacterial or mold growth if wet-stored

Any cellulose paper product left damp can promote microbial growth. This is a usage hazard, not a manufacturing defect. Discard wet or damp towels and keep the roll in a dry location.

None known

Formaldehyde in sizing or binders

Modern paper towel sizing does not typically use formaldehyde-releasing resins (common in textiles and permanent-press finishes). Virgin pulp products rely on starch or synthetic polymers, with no industry reports of formaldehyde in tissue paper.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 78% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Paper Napkins & Paper Towels

Seventh Generation White Napkins Lunch (12x250 CT)

Seventh Generation

White Napkins Lunch (12x250 CT)

virgin wood pulp napkins

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS1 flag

Lower-concern choice; unbleached/chlorine-free virgin pulp napkins carry minimal inherent PFAS risk.

Risky category by default

Grove Co. Tree-Free Napkins

Bamboo

Grove Co. Tree-Free Napkins

Bamboo fiber, tree-free pulp

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS1 flag

Lower concern: bamboo napkins lack grease-resistance features that trigger PFAS use; Grove Co.

Risky category by default

Seventh Generation 100% Recycled Napkins 1-Ply

Seventh Generation

100% Recycled Napkins 1-Ply

100% recycled paper (virgin fiber-free)

B
B
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS1 flag

Lower-concern choice; plain paper napkins rarely require PFAS treatments.

Risky category by default

More paper napkins & paper towels grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.