75/ 100
C
OverallF59/100
Urban Decay Hydromaniac Hydrating Dewy Foundation for Dry Skin - 55 (medium deep-neutral undertones)

Urban Decay · Makeup

Urban Decay Hydromaniac Hydrating Dewy Foundation for Dry Skin - 55 (medium deep-neutral undertones)

C · Moderate

Lower concern for PFAS; cosmetic formulations rarely require water-repellent chemistry, but Urban Decay makes no public disclosure.

Verdict: BuyLiquid foundation with lower PFAS concern; standard cosmetic hazards manageable with normal use and patch testing.

This is a hydrating liquid foundation with no known PFAS-triggering ingredients (nonstick coatings, water-resistant treatments, or Teflon-family coating are not typical for makeup). Urban Decay does not publicly claim PFAS-free status or hold third-party certifications. No lab data is publicly available.

Shop Urban Decay on Amazon →

Material

liquid foundation (water, pigments, binders, humectants)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Hydromaniac is a water-based liquid foundation containing pigments (iron oxides, mica), humectants (glycerin, likely hyaluronic acid given the product name), and synthetic binders to create a dewy finish. Water-based formulations present lower risk than oil-based or heavily silicone-laden alternatives because they lack the chemistry that typically requires PFAS water repellents. The 'hydrating' positioning indicates inclusion of moisture-retaining ingredients rather than problematic occlusives.

The brand's record and disclosure

Urban Decay (Estee Lauder subsidiary) does not publish ingredient transparency reports or third-party safety certifications. The brand has no documented recalls or regulatory actions tied to this product line as of public record. Urban Decay maintains no explicit PFAS disclosure statement, which is standard for most mainstream cosmetics brands but leaves questions about ingredient sourcing unanswered. Parent company Estee Lauder has faced historical scrutiny over fragrance transparency but not specific foundation safety issues.

How it compares in its category

Hydromaniac occupies the mid-premium segment typical of Urban Decay's positioning. Water-based liquid foundations are generally lower-risk than long-wear or waterproof formulas, which more commonly contain silicones, film-formers, and potential PFAS. Compared to brands with explicit heavy-metal testing or clean certifications (e.g., Glossier, Trinny London), Urban Decay offers no published safety differentiation. Versus drugstore alternatives, the price reflects marketing rather than documented safety advantage.

If you buy it

Patch test on inner arm 24 hours before face application, as synthetic pigments and fragrance components can trigger contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight; liquid foundations are stable at room temperature and do not require refrigeration. Discard after 12 months or if you notice separation, color change, or odor shift, which signals potential microbial growth or emulsion breakdown. If worn over extended periods, remove gently with a cleanser designed for makeup; rough rubbing can irritate skin.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Heavy metals in pigments (lead, cadmium, arsenic)

Iron oxides and mica pigments used in foundations are generally low-risk, but independent testing of cosmetic pigments has occasionally detected trace heavy metals. Urban Decay does not disclose pigment sourcing or third-party metal testing for this product, so residual contamination cannot be ruled out.

Possible

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components

Urban Decay foundations typically contain fragrance or fragrance masking agents listed as 'parfum' rather than itemized components. Individuals with fragrance sensitivity or a history of contact dermatitis may react; specific allergenic fragrance materials are not publicly identified.

Possible

Formaldehyde releasers in preservative systems

Water-based liquid cosmetics require preservatives to prevent microbial growth. Common preservatives in foundations include DMDM hydantoin or imidazolidinyl urea, which slowly release trace formaldehyde. Exposure at cosmetic levels is considered safe by regulatory agencies, but sensitive individuals may experience localized irritation.

None known

Synthetic colorants and azo dye metabolites

Hydromaniac uses mineral pigments (iron oxides) rather than synthetic azo dyes, so risk of azo dye breakdown is minimal. No recalls or safety alerts involving this product's pigment system are on record.

Possible

Microbial contamination if contaminated during use

Liquid foundations in pump or tube packaging are lower-risk than jar formats, but repeated finger contact or exposure to moisture can introduce bacteria. Proper storage and adherence to expiration dates mitigate this risk.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More makeup grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.