65/ 100
D
OverallF59/100
Men's Under Armour Performance Tech Mesh-Mod 6 in 3 Pack

Under Armour · Waterproof Sports & Performance Undergarments

Men's Under Armour Performance Tech Mesh-Mod 6 in 3 Pack

D · Elevated

Performance athletic mesh without waterproofing, lower PFAS concern than water-repellent coating gear.

Verdict: SkipPolyester mesh boxer briefs with no reported hazards; standard athletic wear with minimal chemical risk profile for this category.

These are basic moisture-wicking mesh shorts without water-resistant or stain-resistant finishes. No public PFAS claims from Under Armour on this product. Lower risk than treated performance apparel, but brand offers no transparency.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

polyester mesh, nylon blend

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This product is polyester mesh blended with nylon, a synthetic fiber combination common in performance athletic underwear. Polyester itself is chemically stable during normal wear and washing. The mesh construction (open weave) means minimal fabric density, reducing potential for trapped moisture or bacterial growth compared to dense synthetic fabrics. No waterproofing or water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating is applied, which eliminates the primary vector for PFAS contamination in performance textiles.

The brand's record and disclosure

Under Armour has not publicly disclosed detailed chemical composition or flame retardant/antimicrobial treatment protocols for their baseline apparel lines. The company does not hold major third-party certifications like BLUESIGN or OEKO-TEX for standard underwear products. No recalls or substantiated contamination incidents have been reported for Under Armour boxer briefs in public databases. The brand's silence on PFAS is typical for non-waterproofed athletic wear, where such treatments are not necessary.

How it compares in its category

Men's synthetic boxer briefs are a commodity category with fairly uniform material profiles across brands. Under Armour's mesh-mod design is mid-range for athletic underwear; it sits between basic polyester briefs and premium merino-blend or modal alternatives. Most polyester boxer briefs at this price point carry equivalent chemical risk profiles. The absence of special coatings (waterproofing, moisture-wicking treatments) actually puts this product at lower chemical risk than branded performance underwear with added functional finishes.

If you buy it

Wash in warm water with standard detergent; synthetic underwear does not require special care. Polyester mesh can withstand machine drying on low to medium heat without degradation. Replace when elastic loses tension or mesh develops permanent odor despite washing, typically after 1-2 years of regular use. No special storage precautions are needed. If skin irritation occurs, it is more likely due to detergent residue than fiber chemistry; rinse thoroughly and consider a fragrance-free wash.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

None known

Azo dyes in polyester

Polyester mesh boxer briefs typically use reactive dyes rather than azo dyes, and this product carries no public report of azo dye use or associated health incidents. Risk is low for this garment type and color range.

Possible

Formaldehyde resins (wrinkle-resistance finishes)

No public disclosure from Under Armour confirms or excludes formaldehyde-based finishing treatments on this mesh. If present, off-gassing during first washes would be minimal. Standard washing will remove residual formaldehyde within 2-3 cycles.

None known

Antimony in polyester

Antimony (a polymerization catalyst in polyester production) remains locked in the polymer matrix and does not leach during wear or washing. No hazard is established for standard polyester apparel.

None known

Flame retardants

Underwear is not a regulated flame-retardant product category in most jurisdictions. No flame retardant treatment is standard for men's boxer briefs, and none is disclosed or publicly reported for this product.

None known

Phthalates in dyes or plastics (elastic, waistband)

Waistband elastic is typically thermoplastic polyurethane or spandex; phthalate use in apparel elastic has declined sharply. No specific incident or disclosure connects Under Armour boxer briefs to phthalate risk.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More waterproof sports & performance undergarments grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.