50/ 100
F
OverallF46/100
Top Flite 2024 XL Control Personalized Golf Balls

Top Flite · Golf Equipment & Balls

Top Flite 2024 XL Control Personalized Golf Balls

F · High PFAS

No public PFAS data available. Standard golf ball composition unclear.

Verdict: SkipGolf balls pose minimal consumer safety risk; synthetic polymer covers and rubber cores have no established hazards in normal use.

Top Flite does not disclose PFAS information for this ball. Golf balls typically use synthetic polymers whose PFAS content is industry-wide undisclosed by most brands.

The safe swap

Wilson Staff Zip Golf Balls

Wilson

Wilson Staff Zip Golf Balls

85/100 safety

B

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned its B.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Synthetic rubber/polymer core with urethane or polyurethane cover

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Unknown / proprietary coating

Proprietary coating with no disclosed chemistry.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Top Flite 2024 XL Control balls use a synthetic rubber or polymer core wrapped in a urethane or polyurethane cover, standard construction for mid-market golf balls. Urethane is a durable, non-toxic elastomer when cured and is not known to leach chemicals during normal play or storage at ambient temperatures. The cover may contain colorants and UV stabilizers, but these remain bound in the polymer matrix and do not migrate into skin or food.

The brand's record and disclosure

Top Flite (owned by Callaway Golf) does not publish detailed material safety data sheets or third-party certifications for golf balls. The brand has not faced documented recalls or safety allegations related to ball composition. No public statement exists on PFAS use in their ball manufacturing, leaving that question unresolved.

How it compares in its category

Golf balls across all major brands (Titleist, Bridgestone, Callaway) use similar synthetic core and urethane cover designs with comparable material profiles. There are no established safety differentiators between brands in this segment; regulatory focus on golf equipment is minimal because contact is indirect and intermittent.

If you buy it

Store balls at room temperature and normal humidity; extreme heat or prolonged UV exposure may degrade the cover cosmetically but will not release hazardous compounds. Handle normally during play and practice; no special precautions are needed. Discard only if cover is severely cracked or compromised, which is a performance failure rather than a safety trigger.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

None known

Urethane cover degradation and chemical leaching

Polyurethane covers are chemically stable once cured and do not leach residual monomers or additives during normal storage or play. No published reports of degradation byproducts migrating into skin or food.

None known

Heavy metals in colorants and pigments

Golf balls are not ingested and skin contact is brief and indirect during play. Colorant migration into saliva or sweat is not documented for modern urethane covers.

Possible

Rubber/polymer volatile organic compounds (VOCs)

Newly manufactured balls may off-gas trace VOCs during the first weeks of storage, particularly if sealed in plastic. This is typically minimal and resolves quickly; ventilation during storage reduces any exposure.

None known

Choking or ingestion hazard (pediatric)

Golf balls are large (1.68 inch minimum diameter) and rigid, unsuitable for young children but not marketed to them; no documented aspiration risk in the intended adult user population.

None known

Synthetic polymer microplastics shedding

Urethane covers do not friably shed microparticles during normal use; degradation is slow and cosmetic rather than structural fragmentation.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Golf Equipment & Balls

Wilson Staff Zip Golf Balls

Wilson

Staff Zip Golf Balls

Synthetic rubber/elastomer cover, solid core

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern. Golf ball cores/covers rarely treated with PFAS.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Vice Golf 24-Ball Variety Pack

Vice Golf

24-Ball Variety Pack

Urethane and synthetic rubber cover over core materials

B
B
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS1 flag

Golf balls carry low PFAS risk; no public concerns documented.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Vice Golf Boost Starter Set

Vice Golf

Boost Starter Set

Surlyn cover, rubber/synthetic components

B
B
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS1 flag

Golf balls carry minimal PFAS risk; skip only if extreme caution desired.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf equipment & balls grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.